From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jia Jia" <physicalmtea@gmail.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Eugenio Perez" <eperezma@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] vsock/virtio: defer RX readable notifications until batch unlock
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 06:49:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-169137@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261013063112.168321-5-physicalmtea@gmail.com>
> An RX batch can make a socket readable while the worker still owns its
> socket lock. Waking a reader at that point can make it immediately wait
> for the same lock.
>
> For the callback installed by sock_init_data(), record when the existing
> low-watermark condition is met and issue one notification after the batch
> releases the lock. Save the initial sock_def_readable() callback when the
> AF_VSOCK socket is created because virtio_transport_common can be built as
> a module and cannot refer to that unexported symbol directly.
>
> Require the original protocol and both saved callbacks for batching.
> Sockets with callbacks installed by sockmap or another user retain their
> existing per-packet behavior.
>
> A psock is published before sockmap replaces the callbacks and is excluded
> by the batch admission checks. If an attach races an active native batch,
> only a packet admitted before that publication can complete on the native
> path; the next packet ends the batch. No queued skb handoff is needed.
>
> Keep the socket reference until the deferred callback completes. Control
> packets, state transitions, transport changes and non-batched sockets keep
> their existing behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia Jia <physicalmtea@gmail.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261013063112.168321-1-physicalmtea@gmail.com?part=4
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-13 6:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-13 6:31 [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] vsock/virtio: reduce RX per-packet socket overhead Jia Jia
2026-10-13 6:31 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/4] vsock/virtio: split socket lookup from locked RX processing Jia Jia
2026-10-13 6:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 6:31 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/4] vsock/virtio: amortize RX socket locking for stream packets Jia Jia
2026-10-13 6:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 6:31 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/4] vsock/virtio: coalesce RX write-space notifications in lock batches Jia Jia
2026-10-13 6:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 6:31 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] vsock/virtio: defer RX readable notifications until batch unlock Jia Jia
2026-10-13 6:49 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-169137@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=physicalmtea@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.