All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev, "Eugenio Perez" <eperezma@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] net: resolve uncommon partial checksums at ingress
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 11:15:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-169596@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e12c6a45aae251d1642af55d8d3121e554993a66.1791887415.git.mst@redhat.com>

> A virtio net header can place CHECKSUM_PARTIAL at any in-packet
> offset.  If that state is retained, later checksum completion can
> modify the packet after protocol processing has made decisions from it.
> 
> Let's fix that: let's validate csum_start and csum_offset and only keep
> CHECKSUM_PARTIAL when csum_start and csum_offset match a parsed TCP or
> UDP header, while handling VLAN headers, IPv4 options and IPv6 extension
> headers.  Complete other non-GSO checksums immediately, before any
> protocol processing runs.
> 
> We can't easily "complete the checksum" for GSO we don't recognize - GSO
> assumes knowledge of the protocol. We could segment ignoring the
> checksum then do whatever csum_start and csum_offset say, but that
> seems like an overkill for something that should happen.
> 
> UDP tunnel headers get the same handling on the inner header.
> 
> Packets without VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM are unaffected.
> 
> Suggested-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1791887415.git.mst@redhat.com?part=3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-13 11:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-13 10:58 [PATCH net-next 0/4] more virtio-net csum hardening Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-13 10:58 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: add ip4_parse() Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-13 11:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 10:58 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: use ip4_parse() in receive validation Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-13 11:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 10:58 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] net: resolve uncommon partial checksums at ingress Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-13 11:06   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-13 15:03     ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-10-13 11:15   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-13 10:58 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] net: account for ingress-resolved virtio net hdr state Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-13 11:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 11:05 ` [PATCH net-next 0/4] more virtio-net csum hardening Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-13 14:41 ` Willem de Bruijn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-169596@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.