From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 04/11] namei: expose the stepwise ancestor walk to fs/
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 16:54:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-170169@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261013164800.2906577-5-utilityemal77@gmail.com>
> Make vfs_walk_start(), vfs_walk_next() and vfs_walk_end() non-static
> and declare them in fs/internal.h next to the walk state, so an
> iterating consumer (BPF) can drive the walk with every step and
> invariant staying in namei.c. vfs_walk_ancestors() and its callback
> contract are unchanged.
>
> Signed-off-by: Justin Suess <utilityemal77@gmail.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261013164800.2906577-1-utilityemal77@gmail.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-13 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-13 16:47 [PATCH bpf-next v1 00/11] fs: unified VFS ancestor walk for Landlock and BPF Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 01/11] namei: introduce __path_walk_parent() Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 02/11] namei: add vfs_walk_ancestors() Justin Suess
2026-10-13 17:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 03/11] landlock: convert ancestor walk to vfs_walk_ancestors() Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 04/11] namei: expose the stepwise ancestor walk to fs/ Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:54 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 05/11] bpf: add a path ancestor iterator Justin Suess
2026-10-13 17:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 18:00 ` Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 06/11] selftests/bpf: exercise the " Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 19:50 ` Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 07/11] fs: add mnt_undo_legitimize() Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 08/11] namei: add an rcu-walk mode to the ancestor walk Justin Suess
2026-10-13 17:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 17:56 ` Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 09/11] bpf: support "__uninit" iterator arguments in generic kfuncs Justin Suess
2026-10-13 17:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 10/11] bpf: add a lockless path ancestor iterator Justin Suess
2026-10-13 17:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 16:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 11/11] selftests/bpf: exercise the " Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 17:50 ` bot+bpf-ci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-170169@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.