From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/19] perf evsel: Don't dump probe events to PERF_TEST_ATTR
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:31:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-173532@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261016001843.71978-9-acme@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] perf: fd leak in evsel__open_cpu() on missing feature fallback
--
commit 4b54c2ca3d287fefa4e358bd15bc06b547bbe8da
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
perf evsel: Don't dump probe events to PERF_TEST_ATTR
This commit prevents support probe events from being dumped into the
$PERF_TEST_ATTR event files. It introduces a support_probe flag to identify
events opened strictly to query supported features.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/asWQvXRdqp_RK85c@google.com/
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> index e61f309e93dcc..59318fef03cb1 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> @@ -3104,7 +3104,11 @@ static int evsel__open_cpu(struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_cpu_map *cpus,
>
> bpf_counter__install_pe(evsel, idx, fd);
>
> - if (unlikely(test_attr__enabled())) {
> + /*
> + * Support probes aren't what was asked for, leave them
> + * out of the PERF_TEST_ATTR dump.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(test_attr__enabled() && !evsel->support_probe)) {
[Severity: Medium]
Does this code leak file descriptors when a missing feature fallback is
triggered on a subsequent loop iteration?
If sys_perf_event_open() succeeds on a capable CPU and records the file
descriptor, but then fails on an incapable CPU, the code jumps to restart
the loop:
evsel__open_cpu() {
...
fallback_missing_features:
evsel__disable_missing_features(evsel);
...
for (idx = start_cpu_map_idx; idx < end_cpu_map_idx; idx++) {
...
for (thread = 0; thread < nthreads; thread++) {
...
fd = sys_perf_event_open(...);
FD(evsel, idx, thread) = fd;
if (fd < 0) {
err = -errno;
goto try_fallback;
}
...
try_fallback:
...
if (err == -EINVAL && evsel__detect_missing_features(evsel, cpu))
goto fallback_missing_features;
}
When evsel__detect_missing_features() triggers the jump back to
fallback_missing_features, it appears the loop restarts from
start_cpu_map_idx without routing through out_close to clean up the
previously opened file descriptors. Can this leak the file descriptors when
the array entries are overwritten?
> test_attr__open(&evsel->core.attr, pid, cpu,
> fd, group_fd, evsel->open_flags);
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261016001843.71978-1-acme@kernel.org?part=8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-16 0:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-16 0:18 [PATCH v3 0/19] perf test attr: Report the failures again and cope with more than one core PMU Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 01/19] perf test attr: Fix record dwarf sample_type expectation Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 02/19] perf test attr: Allow tests to require a core PMU Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 03/19] perf test attr: Fix legacy event encodings in group tests Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 04/19] perf test attr: Fix default stat metrics expectations Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 05/19] perf test attr: Relax group checking for ungrouped expectations Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 06/19] perf evsel: Mark the event as supported when retrying an open Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 07/19] perf test attr: Ignore the core PMU type perf puts in 'config' Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 08/19] perf evsel: Don't dump probe events to PERF_TEST_ATTR Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:31 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 09/19] perf test attr: Introduce mask_bits(), generalizing hide_core_pmu_type() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 10/19] perf test attr: Accept either sample id bit perf asks for Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 11/19] perf test attr: Ignore the dummy tracking event and the terms it carries Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 12/19] perf test attr: Leave out the events of the other core PMUs Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 13/19] perf test attr: Ignore the group read_format bit the PMU count can remove Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 14/19] perf test attr: State, spelled out in a line, why a test is skipped Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 15/19] perf tests: Introduce a 'needs_mlock' suite flag Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 16/19] perf tests: Mark the C tests mapping perf ring buffers Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 17/19] perf tests: Mark the shell tests not " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 18/19] perf mutex: Add a robust, process-shared mutex initializer Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 19/19] perf test: Take turns using the perf mlock budget in the mmaping tests Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-10-16 0:28 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-173532@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.