From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74C82404BF9 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 21:24:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792185895; cv=none; b=f8F1VqqSJLHsmmWe7esWga9wpVjjQqS9qORtNUeoFs1Y2sGsmHg3rVgNr1Lm1uXovqWQB1yTHt1xvKRdmmc/bWg0grN16Bh946AXnvKE1ek58sWX9CEtkX/1EYllB6d1D8Yzz45QzXGnJcy2rp0lLLQ8nXlZm6grOdThweNG+tc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792185895; c=relaxed/simple; bh=J1UhjGyYEw8lFn7ZJNd3vxnFRjJLqMIJvaRZCZ2/w+0=; h=Message-ID:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type: Date; b=LaOKxusAenTqBJpwEukTd9bdYf0ZkkshCic3pr+SQfQimGrpHBHqQ/YXDwc9a9DPFD7rUeIiBED9qTWwGtkNtXZWPyYFl+AWBUA8BPcbgGzjAhEVbMpDxMwr3qa3z07U01wLcE7gH7BSjDMHiZVPh0SZH4qO4zmuXY9SMw0YqEI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=gBCTO7fw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="gBCTO7fw" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3CFFC1F000C6; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 21:24:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792185894; bh=J1UhjGyYEw8lFn7ZJNd3vxnFRjJLqMIJvaRZCZ2/w+0=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=gBCTO7fwZ9uf0eD60sQzItEj1cVrV60HJnttDDTeX/08Tdv1MIi5bVRggSWYnW5Ow ZiXB94z80fbfEsXA3nGHRjJZdklXYvdtWnleb0+emyhyRWmNZJjA/x+tfdjWXZ1r2Y zAdIHlgbotDV8555lUZT+SyHumDTpPVWip4f7LUy1HPSHuKHL1WXXBZ6A+GdUczdXy NkMXYDSTWF2f5UkhbKTn2+N+nR2Ksb6Y52oFm8+1o2qtsvLK9gFD4lR+d7Y7yrotE5 RBeu7Zw4kPaxr7vsNRb5Oq6vT8w6C4ZvntWWT0DPL9ck3a8q7CyX5yePXG97fU4I/Z qEG/48mGd8C0g== Message-ID: From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 18/21] perf tests: Mark the C tests mapping perf ring buffers Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20261016212102.76550-19-acme@kernel.org> References: <20261016212102.76550-1-acme@kernel.org> <20261016212102.76550-19-acme@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 21:24:53 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo >=20 > The C tests that run 'perf record' in the test process itself map ring > buffers and so need room in the per user budget set in > kernel.perf_event_mlock_kb: mark them with the new 'needs_mlock' suite > flag, read by the turnstile added later in the series, so that they > take turns using that budget while the tests that don't map them keep > running in parallel. >=20 > Assisted-by: LLM > Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261016212102.7655= 0-1-acme@kernel.org?part=3D18