From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Joonho Lee" <mynameisjune111@gmail.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Eugenio Perez" <eperezma@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] ALSA: virtio: prioritize staged capture period work
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2026 06:03:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-175327@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <rfc-virtio-snd-capture-followups-2.f2737c95c12e45b4@gmail.com>
> CPU contention can delay staged capture period notifications while RX
> completions continue filling the unread ring. In a two-vCPU VZ guest with
> 16 nice-0 CPU workers, the ACK-fixed baseline stopped with ring_capacity
> and EPIPE in three runs, after 11.74, 30.77 and 30.33 seconds of audio.
>
> Route staged capture period work through system_highpri_wq with a common
> helper at all ten producers, including ACK errors and self-requeue. Keep
> playback and non-staged streams on the normal workqueue. Initialization,
> cancellation, buffer geometry and capture accounting remain unchanged.
>
> With the same kernel, input, geometry and userspace priority, the candidate
> completed three 70-second captures and immediate reopens. Its maximum
> matched queue-to-start delay was 20.366 ms, versus 108.112 ms in the first
> baseline failure. The other baseline failures had pending work without
> matching execution, so matched-only statistics do not bound that delay.
>
> Reader scheduling delays were also present. Both arms passed a separate
> nice -10 reader control, and host load varied between runs. These results
> support the change for the tested workload without isolating a kernel-only
> cause or guaranteeing lossless capture under arbitrary CPU load.
> KASAN/lockdep QEMU regressions passed with the unchanged candidate source.
>
> This follows the staged ACK fix and pending VZ capture support. The
> introducing staged-capture patch has no upstream Fixes commit ID yet.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/rfc-v2-vz-capture-compat-1.b9ab4c1540dc4691@gmail.com/
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Joonho Lee <mynameisjune111@gmail.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/rfc-virtio-snd-capture-followups-0.f2737c95c12e45b4@gmail.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-17 6:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-17 6:00 [RFC PATCH 0/2] ALSA: virtio: fix staged capture ACK ordering and period scheduling Joonho Lee
2026-10-17 6:00 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] ALSA: virtio: account staged capture reads before RX refill Joonho Lee
2026-10-17 6:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-17 6:00 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] ALSA: virtio: prioritize staged capture period work Joonho Lee
2026-10-17 6:03 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-17 12:51 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] ALSA: virtio: fix staged capture ACK ordering and period scheduling Joonho Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-175327@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mynameisjune111@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.