From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B66CA3DD875 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2026 17:16:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792343791; cv=none; b=AOnWn5qcjSYAMzBsiUI/7zR8L3fRyaKwqNZ5kZXmRrEYhXEIslPB2QK/p3xISSzT+P0gV0soVYxvh0FfCDUP1stOAMQF9Inujk+bpS9or9cHv1cy/VcdaMcoX1ZDnww13w4hVqr8ttagcGmGeyrkGks7Dd+TI3672gl0Nvyh/6E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792343791; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7TKs4fnhUq607W+ZZpiDyb+sO1pIF/SXK4nXlqGJkCU=; h=Message-ID:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type: Date; b=eqTvsbjtTADCl/rUfqLG6U1KsEXiNc5bcMA7O3qJsstpWLRyzb+CynW75lEdHbCRIeaOAwlhXQ+KtT56lrb2QlpY8fE+sB8PDnxV7YgRoNuloz0BW28+HOGtwX1EkmIYH970enlBTDRM0AH0dR8MMxBN53Kjyo3L1jdwFlJhApI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=VkpoGHRM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="VkpoGHRM" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 39A5B1F000C4 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2026 17:16:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792343790; bh=7TKs4fnhUq607W+ZZpiDyb+sO1pIF/SXK4nXlqGJkCU=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=VkpoGHRMjrjcq8wsBx1OnUjVkCK25pdWHR86pb4rcN9wrK/soTE1D5hvcRZgwiQvw mwIReFaHdvtkbEPAKfOLLQV/mOYj/JCqgwb5ybx5ipbrLMTlxIlzEDRAN16ELyRv43 IpR/ikSh0QBH9+zsuwUwrqqr+Fw+U2ejX0NrRO4E5GqHZp37VtsRGXWqGYZ1BJCG0v R+6f8von3BQ2dRUCWXeY+6b5TEN5Wffctv42C/IrAtpk5+wrQgLYt52LM9Ytp2WepV Wcn7a+o2zcn4QLuFJObvtumPtHAsUxCiwVqJpbv7OKuCPsP9pPM4I4hsLiOwn6lt1M GZu88v5aCnDCg== Message-ID: From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 8/9] keys/trusted_keys: enable PKWM wrapping key selection by label Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20261018170844.491252-9-ssrish@linux.ibm.com> References: <20261018170844.491252-1-ssrish@linux.ibm.com> <20261018170844.491252-9-ssrish@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2026 17:16:29 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > The PKWM trusted source currently uses the default wrapping key for all > seal and unseal operations. However, PKWM supports multiple wrapping keys, > enabling better isolation between trusted keys. >=20 > Allow users to provide an active wrapping key of their choice created > through sysfs when sealing trusted keys through a new wrapping_key=3D > option. If no label is specified, the default wrapping key is used for > sealing. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Srish Srinivasan Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261018170844.4912= 52-1-ssrish@linux.ibm.com?part=3D8