From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Raag Jadav" <raag.jadav@intel.com>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 1/9] drm/xe/gt: Use GT ordered workqueue for wedging
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 03:18:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-176560@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261019023708.128835-2-raag.jadav@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] drm/xe/gt: deadlock on gt->ordered_wq by deferring xe_guc_reset_prepare()
- [High] drm/xe/gt: race in xe_gt_init() leaves GT unwedged on early device wedge
--
commit 2f995deb3d90153d398aa4de2fcfe846b423203b
Author: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
drm/xe/gt: Use GT ordered workqueue for wedging
This commit defers GT wedge teardown to a worker queued on the GT ordered
workqueue and introduces for_each_initialized_gt() to skip uninitialized
GTs when wedging the device.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> index bc9bf6f0b5a79..2ed67fe929e34 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -768,7 +774,7 @@ int xe_gt_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
>
> err = gt_init_with_all_forcewake(gt);
> if (err) {
> - gt_reset_worker_disable(gt);
> + gt_worker_disable(gt);
> return err;
> }
>
> @@ -784,6 +790,8 @@ int xe_gt_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
> return err;
> }
>
> + /* Must be last */
> + WRITE_ONCE(gt->initialized, true);
> return 0;
> }
[Severity: High]
Can setting gt->initialized only at the end of xe_gt_init() cause a GT to
be left unwedged if xe_device_declare_wedged() runs while xe_gt_init() is
still in progress?
In xe_device_probe(), xe_irq_install() runs before the xe_gt_init() loop,
enabling top-level interrupts (such as xe_mert_irq_handler(),
xe_hw_error_irq_handler(), and xe_sysctrl_irq_handler()) and error workers
like csc_hw_error_work. Inside xe_gt_init(), gt_init_with_gt_forcewake()
and gt_init_with_all_forcewake() initialize GuC CT, GuC submission,
gt->tlb_inval, and the migration exec queue, enable GuC communication, and
submit GPU jobs via emit_job_sync() in xe_gt_record_default_lrcs(), all
while gt->initialized is still false.
If xe_device_declare_wedged() is called during this window (from an IRQ or
error worker, from another GT on a multi-GT device, or from a job timeout
or reset failure during xe_gt_record_default_lrcs()):
xe_device_declare_wedged()
atomic_xchg(&xe->wedged.flag, 1);
for_each_initialized_gt(gt, xe, id)
xe_gt_declare_wedged(gt);
for_each_initialized_gt() skips the GT currently inside xe_gt_init()
because gt->initialized is still false. Once xe->wedged.flag is set,
g2h_read() and __guc_ct_send_locked() reject all GuC CT traffic with
-ENOTRECOVERABLE, but xe_gt_declare_wedged() is never queued for this GT to
abort pending GuC CT requests, TLB invalidation fences, or kernel exec
queues. Furthermore, if xe_gt_init() finishes concurrently with an
asynchronous wedge event, it sets gt->initialized = true without checking
xe_device_wedged(xe), leaving the GT active and unwedged on a wedged
device.
> @@ -1204,6 +1212,15 @@ struct xe_hw_engine *xe_gt_any_hw_engine(struct xe_gt *gt)
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +static void gt_wedge_worker(struct work_struct *w)
> +{
> + struct xe_gt *gt = container_of(w, typeof(*gt), wedge.worker);
> +
> + xe_uc_declare_wedged(>->uc);
> + xe_tlb_inval_reset(>->tlb_inval);
> + xe_pm_runtime_put(gt_to_xe(gt));
> +}
> +
> /**
> * xe_gt_declare_wedged() - Declare GT wedged
> * @gt: the GT object
> @@ -1213,8 +1230,11 @@ struct xe_hw_engine *xe_gt_any_hw_engine(struct xe_gt *gt)
> */
> void xe_gt_declare_wedged(struct xe_gt *gt)
> {
> - xe_gt_assert(gt, gt_to_xe(gt)->wedged.mode);
> + struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
>
> - xe_uc_declare_wedged(>->uc);
> - xe_tlb_inval_reset(>->tlb_inval);
> + xe_gt_assert(gt, xe->wedged.mode);
> +
> + xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume(xe);
> + if (!queue_work(gt->ordered_wq, >->wedge.worker))
> + xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> }
[Severity: High]
Does deferring xe_uc_reset_prepare() to gt_wedge_worker() risk a deadlock
and 5-second TDR timeouts on gt->ordered_wq?
When xe_device_declare_wedged() sets xe->wedged.flag, g2h_read() and
__guc_ct_send_locked() immediately begin returning -ENOTRECOVERABLE:
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c:g2h_read() {
...
if (xe_device_wedged(xe))
return -ENOTRECOVERABLE;
...
}
Unlike xe_gt_reset_async(), which calls xe_uc_reset_prepare(>->uc) ->
xe_guc_reset_prepare(guc) synchronously before queueing gt->reset.worker on
gt->ordered_wq, xe_gt_declare_wedged() now defers
xe_uc_declare_wedged(>->uc) -> xe_guc_declare_wedged(&uc->guc) ->
xe_guc_reset_prepare(guc) (which sets guc->submission_state.stopped and
wakes guc->ct.wq) to gt_wedge_worker() on gt->ordered_wq.
If an exec queue is processing a SUSPEND message on sched->work_process_msg
while q->guc->resume_time == RESUME_PENDING or exec_queue_pending_disable(q)
is true, __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_suspend() blocks in an unbounded
wait:
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c:__guc_exec_queue_process_msg_suspend() {
...
wait_event(guc->ct.wq, vf_recovery(guc) ||
((q->guc->resume_time != RESUME_PENDING ||
xe_guc_read_stopped(guc)) && !exec_queue_pending_disable(q)));
...
}
Because g2h_read() is blocked by xe_device_wedged(xe), handle_sched_done()
cannot run to clear RESUME_PENDING or PENDING_DISABLE, so work_process_msg
can only wake when xe_guc_read_stopped(guc) becomes true. If
guc_exec_queue_timedout_job() is running on gt->ordered_wq ahead of
gt->wedge.worker, it calls:
guc_exec_queue_timedout_job()
xe_sched_submission_stop(sched)
cancel_work_sync(&sched->work_process_msg);
This blocks gt->ordered_wq waiting for work_process_msg, while
work_process_msg waits on guc->ct.wq for gt_wedge_worker() to set
xe_guc_read_stopped(guc), and gt_wedge_worker() cannot run because it is
queued behind guc_exec_queue_timedout_job() on the single-threaded
gt->ordered_wq.
Even without a concurrent SUSPEND message, when
guc_exec_queue_timedout_job() runs on gt->ordered_wq while xe->wedged.flag
is set, its wait_event_timeout(guc->ct.wq, ..., HZ * 5) calls for pending
enable/disable or G2H receive neither G2H nor xe_guc_read_stopped(guc),
stalling gt->ordered_wq for 5 seconds before taking a spurious devcoredump
and scheduling a GT reset.
Should xe_gt_declare_wedged() call xe_uc_reset_prepare(>->uc)
synchronously before queueing gt->wedge.worker, matching
xe_gt_reset_async()?
([ ... ])
base-commit: 2efb7a11f1aa4d2dc285fe2680cca22cb9f72f64
--
2.51.2
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261019023708.128835-1-raag.jadav@intel.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-19 3:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-19 2:36 [PATCH v12 0/9] Introduce xe_wedge Raag Jadav
2026-10-19 2:36 ` [PATCH v12 1/9] drm/xe/gt: Use GT ordered workqueue for wedging Raag Jadav
2026-10-19 3:18 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-19 2:36 ` [PATCH v12 2/9] drm/xe: Drop xe_device_set_wedged_method() Raag Jadav
2026-10-19 2:36 ` [PATCH v12 3/9] drm/xe/hw_error: Guard csc_hw_error_work() with runtime PM Raag Jadav
2026-10-19 2:36 ` [PATCH v12 4/9] drm/xe: Move xe_device_wedged_fini() registration to xe_device_probe_early() Raag Jadav
2026-10-19 2:36 ` [PATCH v12 5/9] drm/xe: Make xe_device_declare_wedged() IRQ safe Raag Jadav
2026-10-19 2:36 ` [PATCH v12 6/9] drm/xe/pci_error: Flush GT wedge worker before bus reset Raag Jadav
2026-10-19 2:36 ` [PATCH v12 7/9] drm/xe/amc: Guard xe_amc_work() with runtime PM Raag Jadav
2026-10-19 2:36 ` [PATCH v12 8/9] drm/xe: Introduce xe_wedge Raag Jadav
2026-10-19 2:36 ` [PATCH v12 9/9] drm/xe/ras: Move xe_ras_process_errors() to xe_ras Raag Jadav
2026-10-19 2:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-19 7:18 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Introduce xe_wedge (rev11) Patchwork
2026-10-19 7:20 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-10-19 8:01 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-10-19 9:27 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-176560@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.