From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB4C1489FB9 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 09:30:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792402230; cv=none; b=WXYeN787B5HhPfg6+ab1Q9qhi/CXchA9b3+kzku+YSrNS7Vkk6awQSQhRhlGknvzTkCq0mNl3ZhoEsuHsF7+7KJZE4/BkxhrvMG0oj5zRN5VoCkP4Gclt2qMVWhlwT32coL0LSW+ZF0E+qC3lQi+hOz0LzQ29zVM1OFG2Ijscwo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792402230; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wVgM3lo/OWyZusrULgfXZSvPFNP479FhXyVjG6/5oqQ=; h=Message-ID:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type: Date; b=E8rk2o/m1RauHChrpkywv6xM02VAdevCNj99qU0sgDmrbl9Ucxi3a+Y880stQL3ac/pt5VxUHeZ3+aeJB61XqDTd9mA6FRaIgZpOtakbprenziE/Fkt6rbi0Z+b76/jhMHjyNB3LmrJcG/+DWGUvwM+qLqdixtYN6zrvEOJDhHI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ZiDJazz6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ZiDJazz6" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 404AC1F000C4; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 09:30:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792402229; bh=wVgM3lo/OWyZusrULgfXZSvPFNP479FhXyVjG6/5oqQ=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=ZiDJazz6+8efBvEE84zqgVcMRoiodd63emqgCitQDc4XtTXpeJqgW72aJZ6W7vvvu lJbISNxYG9evUfWik+FsTkaDhz22OAYvF7LOTTNf/W/v8qu8ae16CKjDhlkmmWPPLF wZa3HvHkaU84fhCq91jLv+r0XB3oH8uLzzmLH0UGUR9vLb02JMXTopKSytZblAFzaX d+LvGJFTFwUe1u/vnNZbu5oLaqujDasFq8d6RBxPLJKR7BvQWk5J0/5ycDI1zLDVnt CM6WHcdzlXFfPejt/hbFdrQgHcjjLpieIKY6ATeVD4HLtNI6+GJEeNYcK9HBsw8RQq cJEPZacMil0GA== Message-ID: From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] arm64: qcom: monaco: Fix pcie1_phy compatible to list qcs8300 first Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Krishna Chaitanya Chundru" Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20261019-monaco_ep-v2-5-852cb9f5d012@oss.qualcomm.com> References: <20261019-monaco_ep-v2-0-852cb9f5d012@oss.qualcomm.com> <20261019-monaco_ep-v2-5-852cb9f5d012@oss.qualcomm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 09:30:28 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > The existing pcie1_phy node only listed qcom,sa8775p-qmp-gen4x4-pcie-phy > compatible, since no QCS8300-specific compatible was documented for this > PHY at the time. >=20 > Now that qcom,qcs8300-qmp-gen4x4-pcie-phy is documented, list it first > with qcom,sa8775p-qmp-gen4x4-pcie-phy as its fallback, matching the > order used by the pcie0_ep and pcie1_ep nodes. >=20 > Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio > Signed-off-by: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261019-monaco_ep-= v2-0-852cb9f5d012@oss.qualcomm.com?part=3D5