All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Petr Oros" <poros@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
	linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net 2/3] ice: do not block on the aux device lock in ethtool set_channels
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 06:59:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-178445@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261019065301.3983537-3-poros@redhat.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] ice: TOCTOU NULL dereference on cdev_info->adev in ice_set_channels()
--

commit 41ef61e89b925d28893681cf06722f3b9581b193
Author: Petr Oros <poros@redhat.com>

ice: do not block on the aux device lock in ethtool set_channels

This commit replaces device_lock() with device_trylock() in
ice_set_channels() to avoid a lock inversion between the RTNL lock and the
auxiliary device lock during RDMA auxiliary device probe, returning -EBUSY
when the lock is contended.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c
> index aa87d4f6324e8..976402b6836de 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c
> @@ -3947,7 +3947,11 @@ static int ice_set_channels(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_channels *ch)
>  
>  	if (pf->cdev_info && pf->cdev_info->adev) {
>  		mutex_lock(&pf->adev_mutex);
> -		device_lock(&pf->cdev_info->adev->dev);
> +		if (!device_trylock(&pf->cdev_info->adev->dev)) {
> +			mutex_unlock(&pf->adev_mutex);
> +			netdev_dbg(dev, "RDMA auxiliary device is busy, try again\n");
> +			return -EBUSY;
> +		}
>  		locked = true;
>  		if (pf->cdev_info->adev->dev.driver) {
>  			netdev_err(dev, "Cannot change channels when RDMA is active\n");

[Severity: High]
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but can pf->cdev_info->adev
become NULL between the unlocked check in ice_set_channels() and the
device_trylock(&pf->cdev_info->adev->dev) call?

Paths that do not hold rtnl_lock, such as ice_service_task() handling
ICE_FLAG_UNPLUG_AUX_DEV, ice_prepare_for_reset(), or
ice_devlink_enable_roce_set() and ice_devlink_enable_iw_set(), can run
concurrently and call ice_unplug_aux_dev():

drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_idc.c:ice_unplug_aux_dev() {
	...
	mutex_lock(&pf->adev_mutex);
	adev = pf->cdev_info->adev;
	pf->cdev_info->adev = NULL;
	mutex_unlock(&pf->adev_mutex);

	auxiliary_device_delete(adev);
	auxiliary_device_uninit(adev);
}

If ice_unplug_aux_dev() clears pf->cdev_info->adev after ice_set_channels()
checks it but before ice_set_channels() acquires pf->adev_mutex,
device_trylock(&pf->cdev_info->adev->dev) will dereference a NULL pointer
(and conversely, if ice_plug_aux_dev() assigns cdev->adev concurrently, the
RDMA active check could be skipped).

In contrast, ice_send_event_to_aux() checks cdev->adev after acquiring
pf->adev_mutex:

drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_idc.c:ice_send_event_to_aux() {
	...
	mutex_lock(&pf->adev_mutex);
	if (!cdev->adev)
		goto finish;

	if (!device_trylock(&cdev->adev->dev)) {
	...
}

Should ice_set_channels() likewise acquire pf->adev_mutex before testing
pf->cdev_info->adev?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261019065301.3983537-1-poros@redhat.com?part=2

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-20  6:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-19  6:52 [PATCH iwl-net 0/3] ice: fix RTNL vs auxiliary device lock inversion Petr Oros
2026-10-19  6:52 ` [PATCH iwl-net 1/3] ice: avoid RTNL deadlock when notifying the RDMA auxiliary driver Petr Oros
2026-10-20  6:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-19  6:53 ` [PATCH iwl-net 2/3] ice: do not block on the aux device lock in ethtool set_channels Petr Oros
2026-10-20  6:59   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-19  6:53 ` [PATCH iwl-net 3/3] ice: do not block on the aux device lock in ndo_setup_tc Petr Oros
2026-10-20  6:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-20 10:06 ` [PATCH iwl-net 0/3] ice: fix RTNL vs auxiliary device lock inversion Przemek Kitszel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-178445@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=poros@redhat.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.