All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "James Hilliard" <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>
Cc: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: mediatek: uart: make channel termination atomic
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 21:25:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-182061@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261022-submit-mtk-uart-dma-terminate-atomic-v1-v1-1-aa498ba5da25@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] dmaengine: mediatek: dangling c->desc in mtk_uart_apdma_terminate_all()
--

commit add32020b23bda4849b015bc2e7b816090491c89
Author: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>

dmaengine: mediatek: uart: make channel termination atomic

This commit updates mtk_uart_apdma_terminate_all() to serialize hardware
channel termination under c->vc.lock using atomic register polling instead of
sleeping polls and synchronize_irq(). It also checks VFF_INT_FLAG in
mtk_uart_apdma_irq_handler() under c->vc.lock in case termination already
acknowledged the interrupt, and aborts descriptor cleanup if stopping the
channel times out.

> diff --git a/drivers/dma/mediatek/mtk-uart-apdma.c b/drivers/dma/mediatek/mtk-uart-apdma.c
> index f74e9a3285887..73d4b701ac858 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/mediatek/mtk-uart-apdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/mediatek/mtk-uart-apdma.c
> @@ -256,6 +256,12 @@ static irqreturn_t mtk_uart_apdma_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&c->vc.lock, flags);
> +	/* Termination may have acknowledged an interrupt before we got the lock. */
> +	if (!mtk_uart_apdma_read(c, VFF_INT_FLAG)) {
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&c->vc.lock, flags);
> +		return IRQ_NONE;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (c->dir == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM)
>  		mtk_uart_apdma_rx_handler(c);
>  	else if (c->dir == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV)
> @@ -400,10 +406,12 @@ static int mtk_uart_apdma_terminate_all(struct dma_chan *chan)
>  	LIST_HEAD(head);
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&c->vc.lock, flags);
> +
>  	mtk_uart_apdma_write(c, VFF_FLUSH, VFF_FLUSH_B);
>  
> -	ret = readx_poll_timeout(readl, c->base + VFF_FLUSH,
> -			  status, status != VFF_FLUSH_B, 10, 100);
> +	ret = readx_poll_timeout_atomic(readl, c->base + VFF_FLUSH,
> +					status, status != VFF_FLUSH_B, 10, 100);
>  	if (ret)
>  		dev_err(c->vc.chan.device->dev, "flush: fail, status=0x%x\n",
>  			mtk_uart_apdma_read(c, VFF_DEBUG_STATUS));
> @@ -415,11 +423,14 @@ static int mtk_uart_apdma_terminate_all(struct dma_chan *chan)
>  	 * 3. set stop as 0
>  	 */
>  	mtk_uart_apdma_write(c, VFF_STOP, VFF_STOP_B);
> -	ret = readx_poll_timeout(readl, c->base + VFF_EN,
> -			  status, !status, 10, 100);
> -	if (ret)
> +	ret = readx_poll_timeout_atomic(readl, c->base + VFF_EN,
> +					status, !status, 10, 100);
> +	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(c->vc.chan.device->dev, "stop: fail, status=0x%x\n",
>  			mtk_uart_apdma_read(c, VFF_DEBUG_STATUS));
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&c->vc.lock, flags);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
>  
>  	mtk_uart_apdma_write(c, VFF_STOP, VFF_STOP_CLR_B);
>  	mtk_uart_apdma_write(c, VFF_INT_EN, VFF_INT_EN_CLR_B);
> @@ -429,9 +440,6 @@ static int mtk_uart_apdma_terminate_all(struct dma_chan *chan)
>  	else if (c->dir == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV)
>  		mtk_uart_apdma_write(c, VFF_INT_FLAG, VFF_TX_INT_CLR_B);
>  
> -	synchronize_irq(c->irq);
> -
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&c->vc.lock, flags);
>  	vchan_get_all_descriptors(&c->vc, &head);
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&c->vc.lock, flags);

[Severity: High]
When mtk_uart_apdma_terminate_all() runs while a transfer is active on the
channel (for example, via dmaengine_terminate_async() from
serial8250_tx_dma_flush() or serial8250_rx_dma_flush()), does c->desc remain a
dangling pointer to freed memory?

When a transfer is started in mtk_uart_apdma_issue_pending(), the active
descriptor remains on c->vc.desc_issued while c->desc points to it:

drivers/dma/mediatek/mtk-uart-apdma.c:mtk_uart_apdma_issue_pending() {
	...
	if (vchan_issue_pending(&c->vc) && !c->desc) {
		vd = vchan_next_desc(&c->vc);
		c->desc = to_mtk_uart_apdma_desc(&vd->tx);
	...
}

The only place that clears c->desc is mtk_uart_apdma_chan_complete_handler(),
called from mtk_uart_apdma_irq_handler():

drivers/dma/mediatek/mtk-uart-apdma.c:mtk_uart_apdma_chan_complete_handler() {
	struct mtk_uart_apdma_desc *d = c->desc;

	if (d) {
		list_del(&d->vd.node);
		vchan_cookie_complete(&d->vd);
		c->desc = NULL;
	}
}

In mtk_uart_apdma_terminate_all(), VFF_INT_EN and VFF_INT_FLAG are cleared
under c->vc.lock (so any pending mtk_uart_apdma_irq_handler() sees
!mtk_uart_apdma_read(c, VFF_INT_FLAG) and returns IRQ_NONE early), and
vchan_get_all_descriptors(&c->vc, &head) splices c->vc.desc_issued into head
before vchan_dma_desc_free_list(&c->vc, &head) frees the descriptor.

Because c->desc is not cleared during termination, subsequent calls to
mtk_uart_apdma_issue_pending() will see a non-NULL c->desc and refuse to start
any new transfers on the channel, and any later interrupt on the channel would
dereference the freed descriptor in mtk_uart_apdma_rx_handler() and
mtk_uart_apdma_chan_complete_handler().

Should mtk_uart_apdma_terminate_all() also set c->desc = NULL while holding
c->vc.lock?

>  
>

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261022-submit-mtk-uart-dma-terminate-atomic-v1-v1-1-aa498ba5da25@gmail.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-22 21:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-22 21:18 [PATCH] dmaengine: mediatek: uart: make channel termination atomic James Hilliard
2026-10-22 21:25 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-22 21:34   ` James Hilliard
2026-10-27 16:32 ` Frank Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-182061@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=james.hilliard1@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.