From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jia Jia" <physicalmtea@gmail.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Eugenio Perez" <eperezma@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 5/5] vsock/virtio: defer native RX readiness notifications until batch unlock
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 08:14:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-182493@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261023075140.9613-6-physicalmtea@gmail.com>
> An RX batch can make a socket readable while the RX worker retains its
> socket lock. Waking a blocked reader before release_sock() merely makes it
> wait for the same lock.
>
> P4 coalesces native sk_write_space notifications while retaining their
> under-lock callback context. This patch also coalesces native sk_data_ready
> notifications and moves both callbacks after release_sock(), so awakened
> tasks do not immediately block on the RX worker's socket lock.
>
> Save the native data-ready callback before the AF_VSOCK socket is
> published. Batch only while the native protocol and both native readiness
> callbacks are present and no psock is observed under sk_callback_lock. A
> socket with a replacement callback continues down the existing per-packet
> path.
>
> [ ... ]
> 8K 1.664 1.568 -5.78% [ -7.83%, -3.69%]
> 16K 1.450 1.385 -4.48% [ -6.08%, -2.86%]
> 64K 1.338 1.317 -1.51% [ -3.21%, +0.22%]
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia Jia <physicalmtea@gmail.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261023075140.9613-1-physicalmtea@gmail.com?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-23 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-23 7:51 [PATCH net-next v5 0/5] vsock/virtio: reduce RX per-packet socket overhead Jia Jia
2026-10-23 7:51 ` [PATCH net-next v5 1/5] vsock/virtio: split socket lookup from locked RX processing Jia Jia
2026-10-23 8:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-23 7:51 ` [PATCH net-next v5 2/5] vsock/virtio: factor RX skb metadata budget check Jia Jia
2026-10-23 8:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-23 7:51 ` [PATCH net-next v5 3/5] vsock/virtio: amortize RX socket locking for stream packets Jia Jia
2026-10-23 8:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-23 7:51 ` [PATCH net-next v5 4/5] vsock/virtio: coalesce native RX write-space notifications Jia Jia
2026-10-23 8:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-23 7:51 ` [PATCH net-next v5 5/5] vsock/virtio: defer native RX readiness notifications until batch unlock Jia Jia
2026-10-23 8:14 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-27 12:20 ` [PATCH net-next v5 0/5] vsock/virtio: reduce RX per-packet socket overhead Paolo Abeni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-182493@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=physicalmtea@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.