From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/4] selftests/bpf: libarena: add explicit buddy_grow() call
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2026 16:52:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-186960@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261027162916.10996-4-emil@etsalapatis.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] selftests/bpf: buddy_grow() treats byte size parameter as 1 MiB chunk count
--
commit 423ea247cbc2154b99ae3fbf8b3a6fc0e7d6e98f
Author: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
selftests/bpf: libarena: add explicit buddy_grow() call
This commit adds buddy_grow() to libarena to allow BPF programs to
explicitly grow the buddy allocator arena instead of relying on implicit
growth during buddy_alloc().
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/libarena/include/libarena/buddy.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/libarena/include/libarena/buddy.h
> index 958450fc5f9db..4cad0649dc17a 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/libarena/include/libarena/buddy.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/libarena/include/libarena/buddy.h
> @@ -78,5 +78,6 @@ int buddy_destroy(struct buddy __arena *buddy);
> int buddy_free(struct buddy __arena *buddy, void __arena *free);
> void __arena *buddy_alloc(struct buddy __arena *buddy, size_t size);
> void __arena *buddy_alloc_nogrow(struct buddy __arena *buddy, size_t size);
> +int buddy_grow(struct buddy __arena *buddy, size_t size);
>
> #endif /* __BPF__ */
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/libarena/src/buddy.bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/libarena/src/buddy.bpf.c
> index ed359d4af1f4b..f06b6bd5c088e 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/libarena/src/buddy.bpf.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/libarena/src/buddy.bpf.c
> @@ -812,6 +812,32 @@ void __arena *buddy_alloc_nogrow(struct buddy __arena *buddy, size_t size)
> return buddy_alloc_maygrow(buddy, size, false);
> }
>
> +__weak
> +int buddy_grow(struct buddy __arena *buddy, size_t size)
> +{
> + struct buddy_chunk __arena *chunk;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = zero; i < size && can_loop; i++) {
> + chunk = buddy_chunk_get(buddy);
> + if (!chunk)
> + return -ENOMEM;
[Severity: Medium]
In tools/testing/selftests/bpf/libarena/include/libarena/buddy.h,
buddy_grow() is declared right below buddy_alloc() and
buddy_alloc_nogrow() with the same size_t size parameter, which takes a
size in bytes in those functions.
In tools/testing/selftests/bpf/libarena/src/buddy.bpf.c, buddy_grow() uses
size directly as the loop trip count for buddy_chunk_get(buddy). Each call
to buddy_chunk_get() allocates a 1 MiB chunk (BUDDY_CHUNK_BYTES, or
BUDDY_CHUNK_PAGES = 256 pages) out of the 1 GiB reserved virtual address
range (BUDDY_VADDR_SIZE = 1024 chunks).
If a caller passes a byte count (consistent with buddy_alloc()) or a page
count to buddy_grow(buddy, size), it will allocate size 1 MiB chunks, and
any size greater than 1024 will exhaust BUDDY_VADDR_SIZE and fail with
-ENOMEM while leaving the 1024 allocated chunks attached to
buddy->first_chunk.
Should buddy_grow() convert a byte size into the number of chunks to
allocate, or should the parameter be renamed (for example, to nr_chunks)
and documented to make the unit explicit?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261027162916.10996-1-emil@etsalapatis.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-27 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-27 16:29 [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] selftests/bpf: libarena: compatibility fixups Emil Tsalapatis
2026-10-27 16:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] libarena: remove in-code licenses Emil Tsalapatis
2026-10-27 16:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-27 16:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] selftests/bpf: libarena: make allocator growth on alloc failure optional Emil Tsalapatis
2026-10-27 16:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/4] selftests/bpf: libarena: add explicit buddy_grow() call Emil Tsalapatis
2026-10-27 16:52 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-27 16:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: libarena: Make zero variable type __u32 instead of u32 Emil Tsalapatis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-186960@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.