From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Bryam Vargas" <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net/smc: don't spin in smc_rx_recvmsg() while a pipe holds spliced data
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 08:15:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-188952@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261029-b4-disp-da7f8e6a-v2-1-9052904adf72@proton.me>
> From: Bryam Vargas <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
>
> While bytes spliced off the RMB are still in a pipe, recvmsg() waits
> for the pipe to release them before it copies the data behind them.
> The path to that wait skips the timeout and signal checks, and
> smc_rx_wait() returns at once on RCV_SHUTDOWN. With a signal pending,
> after SHUT_RD, or once the peer closes or shuts down writing,
> recvmsg() spins on a CPU until the pipe is drained, and SIGKILL cannot
> stop it. MSG_DONTWAIT and an expired SO_RCVTIMEO wait there too
> instead of returning -EAGAIN.
>
> Check the timeout and signals before that wait, and end it when the
> pipe releases the data or the connection is killed, not on RCV_SHUTDOWN.
> A zero-length read returns 0 without waiting for the pipe; a
> non-blocking one returns -EAGAIN while poll() still reports the socket
> readable (splice() can still take those bytes). The wait sets
> SOCKWQ_ASYNC_WAITDATA like smc_rx_wait(), so a byte arriving behind
> the pipe raises no SIGIO on a reader already asleep for it, and a full
> barrier orders its wait queue entry before its read of splice_pending,
> so no wake is lost.
>
> Fixes: 9014db202cb7 ("smc: add support for splice()")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Bryam Vargas <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261029-b4-disp-da7f8e6a-v2-1-9052904adf72@proton.me?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-29 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-29 8:03 [PATCH net v2] net/smc: don't spin in smc_rx_recvmsg() while a pipe holds spliced data Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
2026-10-29 8:03 ` Bryam Vargas
2026-10-29 8:06 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-29 8:15 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-03 14:18 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-11-04 16:56 ` Dust Li
2026-11-04 17:00 ` Dust Li
2026-11-05 10:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-188952@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hexlabsecurity@proton.me \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.