From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ian Rogers" <irogers@google.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@kernel.org>,
"Namhyung Kim" <namhyung@kernel.org>,
"Quentin Monnet" <qmo@kernel.org>,
"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>,
"Nicolas Schier" <nsc@kernel.org>,
"Nick Desaulniers" <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
"Bill Wendling" <morbo@google.com>,
"Justin Stitt" <justinstitt@google.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, gary@garyguo.net
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] tools build: Add Rust library build infrastructure and zlib-rs feature test
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 16:57:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-189694@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261029162958.3224280-2-irogers@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] tools build: sub-make PKG_CONFIG override blocks --static append
- [Medium] tools build: lib%.rlib pattern rule fails for subdirectory targets
- [Medium] tools build: missing rustc --target in Makefile.rust and early feature check
--
commit 15e2b90d3792008ff59190071c3b1973f7ab8c0b
Author: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
tools build: Add Rust library build infrastructure and zlib-rs feature test
This patch adds shared Rust library build and feature detection infrastructure
under tools/build/ and tools/scripts/, along with a feature test for zlib-rs.
It supports locating Cargo crate sources or pkg-config packages, compiling
.rlib and .a targets with rustc, and resolving C compiler and linker flags.
> diff --git a/tools/build/Makefile.build b/tools/build/Makefile.build
> index ad69efdd4e85c..50c3eb57d34b8 100644
> --- a/tools/build/Makefile.build
> +++ b/tools/build/Makefile.build
[ ... ]
> @@ -117,6 +120,10 @@ $(OUTPUT)%.s: %.c FORCE
>
> # it's recommended to build a static rust library, when a foreight (to rust)
> # linker is used.
> +$(OUTPUT)lib%.rlib: %.rs FORCE
> + $(call rule_mkdir)
> + $(call if_changed_dep,rustc_rlib_rs)
[Severity: Medium]
Will this pattern rule match .rlib targets located in subdirectories?
Later in tools/build/Makefile.build, targets in obj-y are prefixed with both
$(OUTPUT) and $(dir)/:
objprefix := $(subst ./,,$(OUTPUT)$(dir)/)
obj-y := $(addprefix $(objprefix),$(obj-y))
Other pattern rules in tools/build/Makefile.build place % immediately after
$(OUTPUT), such as $(OUTPUT)%.o: %.c FORCE and $(OUTPUT)%.a: %.rs FORCE, which
allows the stem % to match <subdir>/<name>.
Because $(OUTPUT)lib%.rlib places the literal prefix lib immediately after
$(OUTPUT), a target in a subdirectory expands to
$(OUTPUT)<subdir>/lib<name>.rlib. When $(OUTPUT) is non-empty, the pattern
contains a slash, so GNU Make matches against the full path and fails to match
$(OUTPUT)lib%.rlib whenever <subdir> is present. When $(OUTPUT) is empty,
directory-stripped matching sets the stem % to <name> without <subdir>/, so
the prerequisite %.rs looks for <name>.rs in the current directory rather than
in <subdir>/.
> diff --git a/tools/build/Makefile.feature b/tools/build/Makefile.feature
> index 4d37d11f674c5..c372600ae9e44 100644
> --- a/tools/build/Makefile.feature
> +++ b/tools/build/Makefile.feature
> @@ -5,10 +5,11 @@ ifneq ($(OUTPUT),)
> OUTPUT_FEATURES = $(OUTPUT)feature/
> $(shell mkdir -p $(OUTPUT_FEATURES))
> endif
> +RUST_OUTPUT ?= $(abspath $(or $(OUTPUT),$(CURDIR)))/
>
> feature_check = $(eval $(feature_check_code))
> define feature_check_code
> - feature-$(1) := $(shell $(MAKE) OUTPUT=$(OUTPUT_FEATURES) CC="$(CC)" CXX="$(CXX)" CFLAGS="$(EXTRA_CFLAGS) $(FEATURE_CHECK_CFLAGS-$(1))" CXXFLAGS="$(EXTRA_CXXFLAGS) $(FEATURE_CHECK_CXXFLAGS-$(1))" LDFLAGS="$(LDFLAGS) $(FEATURE_CHECK_LDFLAGS-$(1))" -C $(feature_dir) $(OUTPUT_FEATURES)test-$1.bin >/dev/null 2>/dev/null && echo 1 || echo 0)
> + feature-$(1) := $(shell $(MAKE) OUTPUT=$(OUTPUT_FEATURES) RUST_OUTPUT="$(RUST_OUTPUT)" CC="$(CC)" CXX="$(CXX)" RUSTC="$(RUSTC)" $(if $(PKG_CONFIG),PKG_CONFIG="$(PKG_CONFIG)") CFLAGS="$(CLANG_CROSS_FLAGS) $(EXTRA_CFLAGS) $(FEATURE_CHECK_CFLAGS-$(1))" CXXFLAGS="$(CLANG_CROSS_FLAGS) $(EXTRA_CXXFLAGS) $(FEATURE_CHECK_CXXFLAGS-$(1))" RUST_FLAGS="$(RUST_FLAGS)" LDFLAGS="$(LDFLAGS) $(FEATURE_CHECK_LDFLAGS-$(1))" -C $(feature_dir) $(OUTPUT_FEATURES)test-$1.bin >/dev/null 2>/dev/null && echo 1 || echo 0)
> endef
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/tools/build/Makefile.rust b/tools/build/Makefile.rust
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..cd9e0915b9298
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/build/Makefile.rust
> @@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
[ ... ]
> +ifeq ($(findstring -static,${LDFLAGS}),-static)
> + ifeq ($(findstring --static,$(PKG_CONFIG)),)
> + PKG_CONFIG += --static
> + endif
> +endif
[Severity: Medium]
When LDFLAGS contains -static, does PKG_CONFIG += --static take effect if the
caller passes PKG_CONFIG on the sub-make command line?
Both feature_check_code in tools/build/Makefile.feature and
feature_rust_lib_code in tools/scripts/Makefile.include pass
$(if $(PKG_CONFIG),PKG_CONFIG="$(PKG_CONFIG)") as a command-line argument to
$(MAKE). When invoked from Makefiles that initialize PKG_CONFIG (such as
tools/perf/Makefile.perf or tools/tracing/rtla/Makefile.rtla), PKG_CONFIG has
command-line origin in the sub-make.
In GNU Make, ordinary non-override += appends to a command-line variable are
ignored, so PKG_CONFIG += --static in both tools/build/Makefile.rust and
tools/build/feature/Makefile:
ifeq ($(findstring -static,${LDFLAGS}),-static)
PKG_CONFIG += --static
endif
is skipped during static builds, omitting transitive static libraries from
pkg-config queries. Should these use override PKG_CONFIG += --static?
[ ... ]
> +cmd_rustc_rlib = \
> + $(rustc_target_envs) $(RUSTC) $(RUST_FLAGS) $(rustc_common_flags) $(rustc_target_flags) \
> + $(call rlibs-to-externs,$^) --crate-type rlib --crate-name $(patsubst lib%.rlib,%,$(notdir $@)) \
> + -o $@ $(filter %.rs,$^) > $(@:.rlib=.make.output) 2>&1
> +
> +cmd_rustc_staticlib = \
> + $(rustc_target_envs) $(RUSTC) $(RUST_FLAGS) $(rustc_common_flags) $(rustc_target_flags) \
> + $(call rlibs-to-externs,$^) --crate-type staticlib --crate-name $(patsubst lib%.a,%,$(notdir $@)) \
> + -o $@ $(filter %.rs,$^) > $(@:.a=.make.output) 2>&1
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/tools/scripts/Makefile.arch b/tools/scripts/Makefile.arch
> index ed5f008d400ed..d5f25f3be555f 100644
> --- a/tools/scripts/Makefile.arch
> +++ b/tools/scripts/Makefile.arch
> @@ -50,3 +50,17 @@ ifeq ($(LP64), 1)
> else
> IS_64_BIT := 0
> endif
> +
> +# Map kernel ARCH to rustc --target triples when cross-compiling tools/.
> +ifneq ($(CROSS_COMPILE),)
> + RUST_TARGET_FLAGS_arm := arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi
> + RUST_TARGET_FLAGS_arm64 := aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
> + RUST_TARGET_FLAGS_loongarch := loongarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
> + RUST_TARGET_FLAGS_m68k := m68k-unknown-linux-gnu
> + RUST_TARGET_FLAGS_mips := mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu
> + RUST_TARGET_FLAGS_powerpc := powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu
> + RUST_TARGET_FLAGS_riscv := riscv64gc-unknown-linux-gnu
> + RUST_TARGET_FLAGS_s390 := s390x-unknown-linux-gnu
> + RUST_TARGET_FLAGS_x86 := x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
> + RUST_TARGET_FLAGS_x86_64 := x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
> +endif
[Severity: Medium]
How does RUST_TARGET_FLAGS_$(ARCH) get passed to rustc when tools/build/feature
or tools/build/Makefile.rust builds libz_rs.a during cross-compilation?
tools/scripts/Makefile.arch defines RUST_TARGET_FLAGS_<arch> when CROSS_COMPILE
is set, but neither Makefile.arch, Makefile.include, Makefile.feature, nor
Makefile.rust adds --target=$(RUST_TARGET_FLAGS_$(ARCH)) to RUST_FLAGS or
rustc_common_flags.
When feature_check runs for zlib-rs without --target in RUST_FLAGS (for
example, in tools/build/Makefile.feature when FEATURE_TESTS=all is evaluated
before a caller sets RUST_FLAGS, or in standalone feature checks),
cmd_rustc_rlib and cmd_rustc_staticlib in tools/build/Makefile.rust compile
liblibc.rlib, libzlib_rs.rlib, and libz_rs.a for the host architecture. Linking
test-zlib-rs.bin with the cross-compiler $(CC) then fails, and because the
rules in tools/build/Makefile.rust do not rebuild when RUST_FLAGS changes, the
host-architecture archives remain cached in $(LIBZ_RS_OUTPUT) for subsequent
invocations in the same build directory.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261029162958.3224280-1-irogers@google.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-29 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-29 16:29 [RFC PATCH v1 0/3] tools: Add Rust library build infrastructure and prefer zlib-rs Ian Rogers
2026-10-29 16:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] tools build: Add Rust library build infrastructure and zlib-rs feature test Ian Rogers
2026-10-29 16:57 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-29 16:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/3] perf build: Prefer zlib-rs over zlib when available Ian Rogers
2026-10-29 16:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 16:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/3] bpftool: " Ian Rogers
2026-10-29 17:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-30 0:14 ` Quentin Monnet
2026-10-30 3:11 ` Ian Rogers
2026-10-29 17:32 ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/3] tools: Add Rust library build infrastructure and prefer zlib-rs Miguel Ojeda
2026-10-29 18:23 ` Ian Rogers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-189694@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=nsc@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qmo@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.