From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793356187; b=Tt9EjESW8rshOWfcfjEiP7AzJoQlAQajlyiLUKItQ1UitnpSgnrMXTJP9OHyMsxyr6uk xc8o2x8xr4ofoRxsWHUlg9mPNBd4MvC6SW0uegArcUb4l3099/QvkO26nnlRKTirJPQtl f4xt2Q9hHBWzVUFtrEeOBtNDKh28iY7UiZ0dc/7EYX7dmv9ga9jgZnBtrh631+c9GCobd 1hrYy+gFvuMlE9b4eD6QxYy76i5iliIGlMYKbGu2CjcYMTiCb2ZrBKsxspBudYI85RFI1 z9UrfyTY6FXoV5gTKB1U7U+pVvWU6CNrV0BwyrLaqcCEbGw2WRm4+Aa3XevXgVQJApw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793356187; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:From:Subject:Reply-To:Cc: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date; bh=xkeTzRg7O4mTMMjZ2MwaoQ3nLtFqHBdpSz1Yy0A1e/g=; b=QPjKvaoyrAIEdq6QrLzU6/a5zSZn3nt513amkCD6jPqrLk+jTEOMTgI+l03oiMeSa6N/ DT2rLtR8QY3IzXvsVPaul/rDMUuC8W+NKaTig2iTU/cpijsmeFfBn+KZtXG2vRqKdTMce 2wUSLoX9asZpE1CqYwShKx3H9/tV42a4FTCrAleeRkhjumI2cS44FehIP9ShINWtCDjWW 73X1QseGvVw/2PzOVzF5kWEz2D4CH4Z3q6Lr//OGOoqI4ML/+qCvTGIkNzZOpoYIvEvKL 1EwpDqxSveR/0to0UCB7YVOetzIY/qK6fh40Hj5AxvMrrg6sA16zEAk3p2AaR1ALEjQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=aXnmRHTX; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D3A8606A31A for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2026 10:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=aXnmRHTX Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C323A1F0093A for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2026 10:29:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1793356186; bh=xkeTzRg7O4mTMMjZ2MwaoQ3nLtFqHBdpSz1Yy0A1e/g=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=aXnmRHTXSWikL54eTaULqd6vk533VxAKAMIiMhsGdBf6a+W+iObC8j24lbdCB55MK xaask0D8mRyDGiV3wFwx9gDSwVfljGYrOzw4/4Uq/gk/SiTzG4JUrFAzeRmA9mmW9Y u24UyMYxlEsmlEcpZuoBdQl3nsMueYJUEwefbKfaQVcddpGG6Cho0bHZMAYpnwsQIT 9rGCnWrIaKTfRI+zJ9waboRukG38JKW4/ORRGpwhbuhyigcG0A3cxm18Mp7ERJnaBS VShWW7RFbcADeGabOq5ti7APFGj/RIG0vtoPcc9mGNXkIp904q3bvFk8yvM3rvGpdo o1qeoO+5MUYTA== Message-ID: From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] selftests/landlock: Test that layering does not break refer Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20261030102411.12985-3-gnoack3000@gmail.com> References: <20261030102411.12985-1-gnoack3000@gmail.com> <20261030102411.12985-3-gnoack3000@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2026 10:29:46 +0000 X-Mailing-List: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list > Regression test to exercise that layered Landlock domains do not > accidentally deny the LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER access right. This > used to be the case when layering a non-filesystem ruleset with a > filesystem-enforcing ruleset. In that case, REFER operations that > would have been allowed for the individual rulesets would get denied > when layering the same rulesets. >=20 > Link: https://github.com/landlock-lsm/linux/issues/67 > Link: https://github.com/landlock-lsm/go-landlock/issues/66 > Signed-off-by: G=C3=BCnther Noack Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261030102411.1298= 5-1-gnoack3000@gmail.com?part=3D2