From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Andreas Grapentin" <gra@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] KVM: s390: arm64: Turn vcpu->arch.pause into a counter
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2026 16:41:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-195738@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261103-s390_arm64_kvm_fixups-v1-1-21c36fedd878@linux.ibm.com>
> From: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
>
> The s390 arm64 vcpu struct mirrors arm64's kvm_vcpu_arch. When commit
> e64309198eda2 ("KVM: arm64: Turn vcpu->arch.pause into a counter")
> changed the type of kvm_vcpu_arch.pause from bool to atomic_t, the merge
> into this tree missed the s390 copy, leaving it out of sync.
>
> Nothing on the s390 side accesses vcpu->arch.pause yet, so this has
> no functional effect. Align the type to keep the mirror identical to
> its arm64 counterpart.
>
> Fixes: e6c329180d1d ("KVM: s390: arm64: Introduce host definitions")
> Signed-off-by: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Grapentin <gra@linux.ibm.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261103-s390_arm64_kvm_fixups-v1-0-21c36fedd878@linux.ibm.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-03 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-03 16:37 [PATCH 0/3] KVM: s390: arm64: Fixes for arm64 KVM support Andreas Grapentin
2026-11-03 16:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: s390: arm64: Turn vcpu->arch.pause into a counter Andreas Grapentin
2026-11-03 16:41 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-04 8:12 ` Andreas Grapentin
2026-11-03 16:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: s390: arm64: Declare enum vcpu_sysreg Andreas Grapentin
2026-11-03 16:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 8:01 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-11-04 9:20 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-11-03 16:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: s390: arm64: Fix kvm_arm64 module naming consistency Andreas Grapentin
2026-11-03 16:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 8:07 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-11-04 9:16 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-11-03 18:31 ` [PATCH 0/3] KVM: s390: arm64: Fixes for arm64 KVM support Marc Zyngier
2026-11-04 7:59 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-11-05 12:45 ` Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-195738@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gra@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.