From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Wentao Liang" <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
Cc: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: mxs-saif: unregister the mclk if adding the provider fails
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2026 02:49:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-196531@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261104024048.1508618-1-vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] ASoC: mxs-saif: clk_divider leak in mxs_saif_mclk_init() on error
--
commit b511c3de71e5dad6a930d46251d7637ae094c5cc
Author: Wentao Liang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
ASoC: mxs-saif: unregister the mclk if adding the provider fails
This commit unregisters the mclk in mxs_saif_mclk_init() if
of_clk_add_provider() fails so the registered clock is not leaked.
> diff --git a/sound/soc/mxs/mxs-saif.c b/sound/soc/mxs/mxs-saif.c
> index e46896ac9669c..aaf62f081b327 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/mxs/mxs-saif.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/mxs/mxs-saif.c
> @@ -783,8 +783,10 @@ static int mxs_saif_mclk_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> ret = of_clk_add_provider(np, of_clk_src_simple_get, clk);
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret) {
> + clk_unregister(clk);
[Severity: Medium]
Does calling clk_unregister() here in mxs_saif_mclk_init() (in
sound/soc/mxs/mxs-saif.c) still leak the struct clk_divider when
of_clk_add_provider() fails?
Earlier in mxs_saif_mclk_init(), the clock is registered via
clk_register_divider():
clk = clk_register_divider(&pdev->dev, "mxs_saif_mclk",
__clk_get_name(saif->clk), 0,
saif->base + SAIF_CTRL,
BP_SAIF_CTRL_BITCLK_MULT_RATE, 3,
0, NULL);
clk_register_divider() calls __clk_hw_register_divider() in
drivers/clk/clk-divider.c, which allocates a struct clk_divider wrapper
around struct clk_hw. Because clk_divider_ops does not implement a
.terminate callback, clk_unregister(clk) only unregisters clk_core and frees
the struct clk handle, leaving the struct clk_divider allocation leaked.
Should this call clk_unregister_divider(clk) instead, which frees the
struct clk_divider after calling clk_unregister(clk):
drivers/clk/clk-divider.c:clk_unregister_divider() {
struct clk_divider *div;
struct clk_hw *hw;
hw = __clk_get_hw(clk);
if (!hw)
return;
div = to_clk_divider(hw);
clk_unregister(clk);
kfree(div);
}
or switch to devm_clk_hw_register_divider() and
devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider()?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261104024048.1508618-1-vulab@iscas.ac.cn?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-04 2:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-04 2:40 [PATCH] ASoC: mxs-saif: unregister the mclk if adding the provider fails Wentao Liang
2026-11-04 2:49 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-04 18:20 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-196531@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vulab@iscas.ac.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.