From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Radhey Shyam Pandey" <radhey.shyam.pandey@amd.com>,
robh@kernel.org, saravanak@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
david@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org, liam@infradead.org,
vbabka@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
mhocko@suse.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, robin.murphy@arm.com,
baoquan.he@linux.dev, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com,
pratyush@kernel.org
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] of: reserved_mem: keep the reservation when node_init returns -EBUSY
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2026 16:29:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-197613@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261103162429.2053989-3-radhey.shyam.pandey@amd.com>
> fdt_init_reserved_mem_node() treats any error from a region's init function
> as "this node is unusable" and calls memblock_phys_free() on the whole
> range, although the range was reserved earlier during the FDT scan by code
> unrelated to that init function. Give -EBUSY the meaning "cannot be used as
> described, but must stay reserved" and skip the release for it. Nothing
> returns -EBUSY from node_init today. The next patch does, to refuse a CMA
> pool overlapping the kernel image, which without this would free
> [_text, _end) rather than protect it.
>
> Suggested-by: Pratyush Yadav (Google) <pratyush@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@amd.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261103162429.2053989-1-radhey.shyam.pandey@amd.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-04 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-03 16:24 [PATCH 0/4] kexec,mm/cma: do not run the next kernel from a fixed-base CMA area Radhey Shyam Pandey
2026-11-03 16:24 ` [PATCH 1/4] kexec: do not place the next kernel in a fixed-address " Radhey Shyam Pandey
2026-11-04 16:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 16:24 ` [PATCH 2/4] of: reserved_mem: keep the reservation when node_init returns -EBUSY Radhey Shyam Pandey
2026-11-04 16:29 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-03 16:24 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm/cma: reject CMA areas that overlap the kernel image Radhey Shyam Pandey
2026-11-04 16:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-08 11:05 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-11-03 16:24 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm/cma: drop the duplicate alignment check in rmem_cma_setup() Radhey Shyam Pandey
2026-11-04 16:29 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-197613@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=radhey.shyam.pandey@amd.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.