From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "SJ Park" <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] mm/damon/core: add DAMOS_FILTER_TYPE_AGE_MS
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2026 04:55:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-198571@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261105044425.87142-2-sj@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] mm/damon: 64-to-32-bit truncation of age_ms in damos_filter_match()
--
commit 2459402d4dc794f740b6a5720a69fe4a1a61ae62
Author: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
mm/damon/core: add DAMOS_FILTER_TYPE_AGE_MS
This commit introduces DAMOS_FILTER_TYPE_AGE_MS in the DAMON API and core
layer to allow filtering DAMOS target regions by age in milliseconds. It
converts the region age from aggregation intervals to milliseconds using
div_u64() and compares the result against damos_filter->range_{min,max}.
> diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> index d36823f4d0928..0a056949604f9 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2552,7 +2554,7 @@ static bool damos_filter_match(struct damon_ctx *ctx, struct damon_target *t,
> bool matched = false;
> struct damon_target *ti;
> int target_idx = 0;
> - unsigned long start, end, wsum;
> + unsigned long start, end, wsum, age_ms;
>
> *err = 0;
> switch (filter->type) {
> @@ -2594,6 +2596,12 @@ static bool damos_filter_match(struct damon_ctx *ctx, struct damon_target *t,
> matched = filter->range_min <= wsum &&
> wsum <= filter->range_max;
> break;
> + case DAMOS_FILTER_TYPE_AGE_MS:
> + age_ms = div_u64((u64)r->age * ctx->attrs.aggr_interval,
> + USEC_PER_MSEC);
> + matched = filter->range_min <= age_ms &&
> + age_ms <= filter->range_max;
> + break;
[Severity: Medium]
In damos_filter_match(), age_ms is declared as unsigned long. On 32-bit
architectures, unsigned long is 32 bits wide, so storing the u64 return value
of div_u64() into age_ms truncates the upper 32 bits whenever the region age
in milliseconds exceeds ULONG_MAX (about 49.7 days, or for example
r->age >= 42,949,673 at the default 100,000 us aggr_interval, and
proportionally earlier when aggr_interval is larger).
When that happens during kdamond_apply_schemes() -> damon_do_apply_schemes()
-> damos_apply_scheme() -> damos_filter_out() -> damos_core_filter_out() ->
damos_filter_match(), age_ms wraps modulo 2^32 and can misclassify old
regions as young regions or fail to match old-region filters.
By comparison, damon_hot_score() in mm/damon/ops-common.c stores the result
of div_u64() in a u64 variable (as fixed in commit 0284dff76e87 ("mm/damon/
ops-common: fix 64-bit division in damon_hot_score()")):
mm/damon/ops-common.c:damon_hot_score() {
...
u64 age_in_sec;
...
age_in_sec = div_u64((u64)r->age * c->attrs.aggr_interval,
USEC_PER_SEC);
...
}
Should age_ms be declared as u64 (or saturated to ULONG_MAX before storing into
age_ms so filters with range_max == ULONG_MAX on 32-bit continue to match) to
avoid truncating the quotient on 32-bit systems?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261105044425.87142-1-sj@kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-05 4:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-05 4:44 [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] mm/damon: introduce age_ms damos core filter type SJ Park
2026-11-05 4:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] mm/damon/core: add DAMOS_FILTER_TYPE_AGE_MS SJ Park
2026-11-05 4:55 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-05 5:09 ` SJ Park
2026-11-05 4:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: support DAMOS_FILTER_TYPE_AGE_MS SJ Park
2026-11-05 4:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 4:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] Docs/mm/damon/design: update for age_ms damos core filter type SJ Park
2026-11-05 4:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 4:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] Docs/admin-guide/mm/damon/usage: update for age_ms damos core filter SJ Park
2026-11-05 4:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 12:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] mm/damon: introduce age_ms damos core filter type Aveline Noir
2026-11-05 14:32 ` SJ Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-198571@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.