From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Dapeng Mi" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v6 15/20] perf/x86/intel: Refresh LBR stack for non-PEBS LBR events when needed
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2026 05:58:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-200872@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106043257.842864-16-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Medium] perf/x86/intel: unrefreshed or clobbered LBR stack on
indirect PEBS drain
--
commit f13e61130af8b47007c91f048b386359760f05ad
Author: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
perf/x86/intel: Refresh LBR stack for non-PEBS LBR events when needed
This commit tracks whether the shared LBR stack has been refreshed during PMI
handling with a lbr_refreshed flag and removes the unconditional LBR read at
PMI entry so the live LBR state is read on demand for non-PEBS LBR events and
re-read if PEBS draining overwrites it.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> index fbde874af6182..b267c68f94676 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -4003,8 +4013,19 @@ static int handle_pmi_common(struct pt_regs *regs, u64 status)
> *
> * The PEBS buffer has to be drained before handling the A-PMI
> */
> - if (is_pebs_counter_event_group(event))
> + if (is_pebs_counter_event_group(event)) {
> + /*
> + * PEBS counter sampling is only supported on adaptive PEBS
> + * and arch-PEBS, both of which snapshot the LBR stack.
> + * No explicit LBR refresh is needed here.
> + */
> static_call(x86_pmu_drain_pebs)(regs, &data);
> + /*
> + * Draining the PEBS buffer can overwrite the shared
> + * LBR stack, so mark lbr_refreshed as false.
> + */
> + lbr_refreshed = false;
> + }
>
> last_period = event->hw.last_period;
>
> @@ -4013,8 +4034,14 @@ static int handle_pmi_common(struct pt_regs *regs, u64 status)
>
> perf_sample_data_init(&data, 0, last_period);
>
> - if (has_branch_stack(event))
> + if (has_branch_stack(event)) {
> + if (!lbr_refreshed) {
> + intel_pmu_lbr_read(cpu_lbr_stack(cpuc),
> + cpuc->lbr_counters);
> + lbr_refreshed = true;
> + }
> intel_pmu_lbr_save_brstack(&data, cpuc, event);
> + }
>
> x86_pmu_clear_perf_regs(regs);
> x86_pmu_update_perf_regs(event, &data, regs, false);
[Severity: Medium]
Can perf_event_overflow() still drain the PEBS buffer and clobber
cpu_lbr_stack(cpuc) when is_pebs_counter_event_group(event) is false?
When a non-PEBS event using PERF_SAMPLE_READ | PERF_FORMAT_GROUP is grouped
with a PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD PEBS LBR sibling (without
PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_CNTR set on the leader), perf_event_overflow() ->
perf_output_sample() -> perf_output_read_group() -> intel_pmu_read_event()
calls intel_pmu_drain_pebs_buffer() before PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK is
written. Draining pending PEBS records calls intel_pmu_store_pebs_lbrs(),
which overwrites cpu_lbr_stack(cpuc) before the current non-PEBS sample
copies data.br_stack and leaves lbr_refreshed set to true for any subsequent
non-PEBS LBR events in the same PMI.
In addition, because the unconditional intel_pmu_lbr_read() at PMI entry is
removed, an indirect PEBS drain on pre-adaptive PEBS
(!x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_baseline) when GLOBAL_STATUS_BUFFER_OVF_BIT is clear
will run intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip() against an unrefreshed
cpu_lbr_stack(cpuc).
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261106043257.842864-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com?part=15
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-06 5:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-06 4:32 [Patch v6 00/20] perf/x86: Fix multiple LBR sampling issues Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 01/20] perf/x86: Disable LBR if x86_pmu.lbr_nr exceeds MAX_LBR_ENTRIES Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 5:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 02/20] perf/x86/intel: Validate LBR XSAVE state before updating LBR stack Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 5:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 03/20] perf/x86/amd/lbr: Limit branch snapshots to valid entries Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 4:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 04/20] perf/x86/intel/lbr: " Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 4:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 05/20] perf/x86: Add lbr_enabled to track LBR state Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 5:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 06/20] perf/x86/amd: Avoid re-enabling PMU and LBR for BPF when disabled Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 5:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 7:07 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 07/20] perf/x86/intel: Add helper to enable PMU without LBR Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 4:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 08/20] perf/x86/intel: Avoid re-enabling PMU and LBR for BPF when disabled Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 5:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 7:09 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 09/20] perf/x86/intel: Keep LBR frozen throughout PMI handling Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 4:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 10/20] perf: Add counted-bounds tracking for perf_branch_stack Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 5:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 11/20] perf/x86/intel: Allow LBR read helpers to operate on explicit stacks Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 5:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 12/20] perf/x86/intel: Use a dedicated LBR stack for BPF snapshotting Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 5:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 13/20] perf/x86/intel: Always snapshot live hardware LBR state for BPF Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 5:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 14/20] perf/x86/amd: Refresh LBR stack in PMI only when LBR users are active Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 5:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 9:59 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 15/20] perf/x86/intel: Refresh LBR stack for non-PEBS LBR events when needed Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 5:58 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-06 6:54 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 16/20] perf/x86/intel: Remove dead lbr_pebs_users Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 5:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 17/20] perf/x86/intel: Clear raw LBR counters in the LBR stack Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 5:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 18/20] perf/x86/intel: Refill LBR stack for LBR counter events in PMI handler Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 5:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 19/20] perf/x86/intel: Pass LBR stack size into store_lbr() Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 5:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 4:32 ` [Patch v6 20/20] perf/core: Don't overwrite shared LBR stack depth Dapeng Mi
2026-11-06 5:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 7:23 ` [Patch v6 00/20] perf/x86: Fix multiple LBR sampling issues Mi, Dapeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-200872@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.