From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Siddharth Nayyar" <sidnayyar@google.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC bpf-next 3/7] libbpf: Support BPF_MAP_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS in bpf_gen__map_create()
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2026 20:33:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-202213@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106-lskel-struct-ops-v1-3-a4486ffc79cb@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Medium] libbpf: double byte-swap of BPF_F_VTYPE_BTF_OBJ_FD in
bpf_gen__map_create()
--
commit 504179d2d83634dc1591a224d0263ff3b4a9b9cf
Author: Siddharth Nayyar <sidnayyar@google.com>
libbpf: Support BPF_MAP_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS in bpf_gen__map_create()
This commit adds support for BPF_MAP_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS maps in
bpf_gen__map_create() when generating a BPF light skeleton, including
handling kernel module BTF object FDs.
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/gen_loader.c b/tools/lib/bpf/gen_loader.c
> index 09713c39f71ec..6027a2762c352 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/gen_loader.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/gen_loader.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -543,6 +543,27 @@ void bpf_gen__map_create(struct bpf_gen *gen,
> stack_off(inner_map_fd));
> close_inner_map_fd = true;
> break;
> + case BPF_MAP_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS:
> + move_blob2blob(gen, attr_field(map_create_attr, value_size), 4,
> + value_size);
> + emit2(gen, BPF_LD_IMM64_RAW_FULL(BPF_REG_1, BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_IDX_VALUE,
> + 0, 0, 0, map_attr->btf_vmlinux_value_type_id));
> + emit(gen, BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0));
> + emit2(gen, BPF_LD_IMM64_RAW_FULL(BPF_REG_1, BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_IDX_VALUE,
> + 0, 0, 0, map_create_attr));
> + emit(gen, BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0,
> + offsetof(union bpf_attr, btf_vmlinux_value_type_id)));
> + emit(gen, BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_RSH, BPF_REG_0, 32));
> + emit(gen, BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 4));
> + emit(gen, BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0,
> + offsetof(union bpf_attr, value_type_btf_obj_fd)));
> + emit(gen, BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
> + offsetof(union bpf_attr, map_flags)));
> + emit(gen, BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_0,
> + tgt_endian(BPF_F_VTYPE_BTF_OBJ_FD)));
> + emit(gen, BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0,
> + offsetof(union bpf_attr, map_flags)));
> + break;
[Severity: Medium]
Does wrapping BPF_F_VTYPE_BTF_OBJ_FD in tgt_endian() double-swap the
instruction immediate when generating a cross-endian light skeleton?
Unlike data blob fields, emitted BPF instructions are built in host byte
order and later byte-swapped in bpf_gen__finish() via bpf_insn_bswap()
when gen->swapped_endian is set:
tools/lib/bpf/gen_loader.c:bpf_gen__finish() {
...
if (gen->swapped_endian) {
struct bpf_insn *insn = (struct bpf_insn *)opts->insns;
int insn_cnt = opts->insns_sz / sizeof(struct bpf_insn);
for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++)
bpf_insn_bswap(insn++);
}
...
}
Pre-swapping the immediate here causes bpf_insn_bswap() to swap insn->imm
back to the wrong byte order, setting 0x00800000 instead of
BPF_F_VTYPE_BTF_OBJ_FD (0x00008000) in attr.map_flags on the target and
causing BPF_MAP_CREATE for kernel module struct_ops maps to fail with
-EINVAL. Passing BPF_F_VTYPE_BTF_OBJ_FD directly without tgt_endian()
avoids the double swap.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261106-lskel-struct-ops-v1-0-a4486ffc79cb@google.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-06 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-06 20:19 [PATCH RFC bpf-next 0/7] bpf: Support struct_ops in light skeletons Siddharth Nayyar
2026-11-06 20:19 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 1/7] bpf: Add bpf_btf_get_struct_member_info() helper Siddharth Nayyar
2026-11-06 20:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 20:56 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-06 20:19 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 2/7] libbpf: Implement bpf_gen__init_kern_struct_ops() for light skeletons Siddharth Nayyar
2026-11-06 20:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 20:56 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-06 20:19 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 3/7] libbpf: Support BPF_MAP_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS in bpf_gen__map_create() Siddharth Nayyar
2026-11-06 20:33 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-06 20:56 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-06 20:19 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 4/7] libbpf: Support BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS in bpf_gen__prog_load() Siddharth Nayyar
2026-11-06 20:56 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-06 20:19 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 5/7] libbpf: Implement bpf_gen__struct_ops_update_elem() for light skeletons Siddharth Nayyar
2026-11-06 20:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 20:56 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-06 20:19 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 6/7] bpftool: Generate attach and detach for struct_ops in " Siddharth Nayyar
2026-11-06 20:19 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 7/7] selftests/bpf: Add light skeleton struct_ops tests Siddharth Nayyar
2026-11-09 19:46 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 0/7] bpf: Support struct_ops in light skeletons Ihor Solodrai
2026-11-09 21:39 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-11-10 13:08 ` Anton Protopopov
2026-11-10 13:12 ` Anton Protopopov
2026-11-11 7:35 ` Sid Nayyar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-202213@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sidnayyar@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.