From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Li Youhong" <dayou5941@163.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, yukuai@fygo.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] md: stop sync_work in md_stop() before clearing pers
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2026 02:51:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-204355@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261109023055.2164333-1-dayou5941@163.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
issues to consider:
- [Medium] md: stop_sync_thread() in md_stop() races with running
md_start_sync()
- [Medium] md: md_check_recovery() can re-queue sync_work during
md_stop()
--
commit 1d5026b108bd24d6a0ff2d1fe48dedbb1f84d4d9
Author: Li Youhong <liyouhong@kylinos.cn>
md: stop sync_work in md_stop() before clearing pers
This commit sets MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN and calls stop_sync_thread() in
md_stop() so that pending sync_work finishes before __md_stop() clears
mddev->pers.
> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
> index 03e35386a8028..6f0fb2bb1fc2b 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> @@ -7130,6 +7130,14 @@ void md_stop(struct mddev *mddev)
> {
> lockdep_assert_held(&mddev->reconfig_mutex);
>
> + /*
> + * md_check_recovery() may have queued sync_work; that work accesses
> + * pers. Wait for it here before __md_stop() clears pers, as
> + * do_md_stop()/md_stop_writes() do.
> + */
> + set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN, &mddev->recovery);
> + stop_sync_thread(mddev, true);
[Severity: Medium]
Can stop_sync_thread() return while md_start_sync() is still accessing
mddev after dropping reconfig_mutex?
Once a worker dequeues mddev->sync_work and starts md_start_sync(),
work_pending(&mddev->sync_work) is false, so stop_sync_thread() skips
flush_work(&mddev->sync_work). In the not_running path of
md_start_sync() (such as on a read-only dm-raid array), md_start_sync()
clears MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING and drops reconfig_mutex before resuming the
device and touching mddev:
CPU0 (raid_dtr) CPU1 (kworker: md_start_sync)
clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, ...)
mddev_unlock(mddev)
mddev_lock_nointr(&rs->md)
md_stop(&rs->md)
stop_sync_thread(mddev, true)
!test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING)
return
__md_stop(mddev)
mddev_unlock(&rs->md)
raid_set_free(rs)
kfree(rs)
__mddev_resume(mddev, false)
test_and_clear_bit(..., &mddev->recovery)
<-- use-after-free
Unconditionally calling flush_work(&mddev->sync_work) after
__md_stop_writes() or after mddev_detach() stops mddev->thread would
ensure md_start_sync() has completely finished before raid_dtr() frees
struct raid_set.
[Severity: Medium]
Can md_check_recovery() re-queue mddev->sync_work while
stop_sync_thread() drops reconfig_mutex in md_stop()?
stop_sync_thread() is called before __md_stop() -> mddev_detach() stops
mddev->thread. When MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING is set on entry,
stop_sync_thread() unlocks reconfig_mutex (waking mddev->thread) and
waits for MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING to clear before re-locking reconfig_mutex.
On a read-only array (such as dm-raid during raid_dtr() after
raid_postsuspend()), the !md_is_rdwr(mddev) branch of
md_check_recovery() does not check MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN before queuing
sync_work:
drivers/md/md.c:md_check_recovery() {
...
if (!md_is_rdwr(mddev)) {
...
if (md_spares_need_change(mddev)) {
set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, &mddev->recovery);
queue_work(md_misc_wq, &mddev->sync_work);
}
...
}
This allows mddev->thread to queue a new sync_work before
stop_sync_thread() re-acquires reconfig_mutex:
CPU0 (raid_dtr) CPU1 (mddev->thread)
md_stop(&rs->md)
set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN, ...)
stop_sync_thread(mddev, true)
mddev_unlock(mddev)
wait_event(resync_wait, ...)
/* previous sync finishes */
md_check_recovery()
mddev_trylock(mddev)
set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, ...)
queue_work(..., &mddev->sync_work)
mddev_unlock(mddev)
mddev_lock_nointr(mddev)
__md_stop(mddev)
mddev->pers = NULL
raid_set_free(rs)
/* kworker runs md_start_sync() */
remove_spares()
mddev->pers->hot_remove_disk()
<-- NULL pointer dereference / UAF
Checking MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN in the !md_is_rdwr(mddev) path of
md_check_recovery() (matching the read-write path), or stopping
sync_work after mddev->thread has been stopped, would close this race.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261109023055.2164333-1-dayou5941@163.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 2:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-09 2:30 [PATCH v2] md: stop sync_work in md_stop() before clearing pers Li Youhong
2026-11-09 2:51 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-204355@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dayou5941@163.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=yukuai@fygo.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.