All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 03/20] bpf: Refuse bpf_task_park() in callbacks
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 00:40:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-205882@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d7e8470a75a3ff4b2e65066f6ba6edb4e5bc14ef.1794269506.git.memxor@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found no new issues
in this patch, but noticed 2 related pre-existing issues it does not
introduce:
- [Critical] bpf: missing in_rbtree_lock_required_cb() check in
  check_func_arg() [1]
- [Critical] bpf: missing parent_id propagation in check_kfunc_call()
  [2]
--

commit 73a7888b7c16b7854db73a1efaa1ffed4dc01be8
Author: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>

bpf: Refuse bpf_task_park() in callbacks

This commit rejects calls to bpf_task_park() inside synchronous,
asynchronous, and exception callback frames by walking the active frames in
the verifier state.

> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index e90cc127aedb8..b42782c7f209d 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -11222,6 +11222,31 @@ static void invalidate_non_owning_refs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
>  	}));
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * bpf_task_park() is confined to the main body of the program and the
> + * functions it calls directly. A callback runs from kernel code that holds
> + * state of its own around the call, an iteration position, a work item or
> + * timer that owns the program only through Tasks Trace RCU, an exiting task,
> + * none of it audited against a sleep that drops the program's protection.
> + * Refuse the park in any callback frame, synchronous, asynchronous or
> + * exception. Asynchronous callbacks are verified as a state of their own
> + * with the callback as frame 0, so the walk over the frames sees them too.
> + */
> +static bool in_callback_frames(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
> +{
> +	struct bpf_verifier_state *vstate = env->cur_state;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i <= vstate->curframe; i++) {
> +		struct bpf_func_state *frame = vstate->frame[i];
> +
> +		if (frame->in_callback_fn || frame->in_async_callback_fn ||
> +		    frame->in_exception_callback_fn)
> +			return true;
> +	}
> +	return false;
> +}

[Severity: Critical]
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but can an rbtree comparator
callback corrupt the tree via [1] because check_func_arg() skips
in_rbtree_lock_required_cb() for bpf_rbtree_add_impl()?

kernel/bpf/verifier.c:check_func_arg() {
	...
	case ARG_PTR_TO_RB_NODE:
		if (is_bpf_rbtree_add_kfunc(meta->func_id)) {
			if (reg->type != (PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC)) {
				verbose(env, "%s expected pointer to allocated object\n",
					reg_arg_name(env, argno));
				return -EINVAL;
			}
			if (!reg_is_referenced(env, reg)) {
				verbose(env, "allocated object must be referenced\n");
				return -EINVAL;
			}
		} else {
			...
			if (in_rbtree_lock_required_cb(env)) {
				verbose(env, "%s not allowed in rbtree cb\n", meta->func_name);
				return -EINVAL;
			}
		}
}

While the outer __bpf_rbtree_add() is mid-traversal inside bpf_call_cb(),
the comparator callback can acquire an owning node reference (for example,
via bpf_list_pop_front()) and invoke bpf_rbtree_add_impl() with a second
comparator subprogram. The nested insertion links the node and rebalances
the tree under the already-held lock, leaving the outer __bpf_rbtree_add()
to finish linking with stale parent, link, and leftmost state when the
callback returns.

> @@ -16366,6 +16391,12 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
>  	}
>  
>  	if (is_bpf_task_park_kfunc(meta.func_id)) {
> +		if (in_callback_frames(env)) {
> +			verbose(env, "bpf_task_park() is not allowed in a callback\n");
> +			bpf_diag_policy(env, insn_idx, "kfunc bpf_task_park", "the call is in a callback",
> +					"Call bpf_task_park() from the main program or from a function it calls directly, not from a callback.");
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
>  		err = check_park_stack_objects(env, insn_idx);
>  		if (err)
>  			return err;

[Severity: Critical]
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but does check_kfunc_call()
fail to track the lifetime of a returned PTR_TO_MEM register [2] when
the kfunc argument is a borrowed pointer?

kernel/bpf/verifier.c:check_kfunc_call() {
			...
			mark_reg_known_zero(env, regs, BPF_REG_0);
			regs[BPF_REG_0].type = PTR_TO_MEM;
			regs[BPF_REG_0].mem_size = meta.ret_mem.size;
			...
			if (meta.ref_obj.id) {
				err = validate_ref_obj(env, &meta.ref_obj);
				if (err)
					return err;
				regs[BPF_REG_0].parent_id = meta.ref_obj.id;
			}
}

For a borrowed pointer argument, meta.ref_obj.id is 0 and the parent
object's lifetime is recorded in meta.ref_obj.parent_id instead. Ignoring
meta.ref_obj.parent_id leaves regs[BPF_REG_0].parent_id unset, so releasing
or invalidating the underlying parent object does not invalidate R0,
allowing a use-after-free through the returned PTR_TO_MEM pointer.

[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-eb46b3eb-92d0-4fac-b401-30327c613b94
[2] https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-3da483d6-33c8-4529-a20e-81cdfb7a8ed3

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1794269506.git.memxor@gmail.com?part=3

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-10  0:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-10  0:27 [PATCH bpf-next v1 00/20] BPF kthreads and waitqueues Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-11-10  0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 01/20] bpf: Add bpf_task_park() and bpf_task_wake() Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-11-10  0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 02/20] bpf: Invalidate what a bpf_task_park() sleep may free Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-11-10  0:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10  0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 03/20] bpf: Refuse bpf_task_park() in callbacks Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-11-10  0:40   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-10  0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 04/20] bpf: Propagate bpf_task_park() through global functions Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-11-10  4:50   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-10  0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 05/20] bpf: Verify a function that parks in the context of its caller Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-11-10  0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 06/20] bpf: Defer bpf_task_wake() to irq_work when IRQs are disabled Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-11-10  1:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10  0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 07/20] bpf: Keep programs that park away from per-CPU state and tail calls Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-11-10  4:50   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-10  0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 08/20] bpf: Register bpf_task_park() for syscall programs Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-11-10  1:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10  4:50   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-10  0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 09/20] bpf: Register bpf_task_wake() for all program types Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-11-10  1:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10  4:50   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-10  0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 10/20] bpf: Add BPF kthreads for syscall programs Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-11-10  0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 11/20] bpf: Let a BPF kthread sleep in bpf_task_park() Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-11-10  0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 12/20] bpf: Add bpf_kthread_bind() to pin a BPF kthread to a CPU Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-11-10  4:50   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-10  0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 13/20] bpf: Add bpf_kthread_attach_cgroup() to place a BPF kthread in a cgroup Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-11-10  4:50   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-10  0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 14/20] selftests/bpf: Test bpf_task_park() and bpf_task_wake() Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-11-10  0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 15/20] selftests/bpf: Test what survives bpf_task_park() Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-11-10  0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 16/20] selftests/bpf: Test bpf_task_park() across functions and callbacks Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-11-10  0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 17/20] selftests/bpf: Test bpf_task_wake() from tracing programs Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-11-10  0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 18/20] selftests/bpf: Test BPF kthreads Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-11-10  4:50   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-10  0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 19/20] selftests/bpf: Test bpf_kthread_bind() Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-11-10  0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 20/20] selftests/bpf: Test bpf_kthread_attach_cgroup() Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-11-10  4:50   ` bot+bpf-ci

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-205882@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.