All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arun Iyengar" <aiyengar1990@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] usb: typec: tcpm: Don't cut a pending state delay short on a re-queue
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 10:52:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-206898@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110-tcpm-attach-reboot-v1-1-7657cc1e2dca@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found no new issues
in this patch, but noticed 1 related pre-existing issue it does not
introduce:
- [Critical] usb: typec: tcpm: use-after-free in tcpm_unregister_port()
  [1]
--

commit fc426c7d09bd548d8d6ca702db9699249b1a96bd
Author: Arun Iyengar <aiyengar1990@gmail.com>

usb: typec: tcpm: Don't cut a pending state delay short on a re-queue

This commit checks whether a pending state transition delay has expired in
tcpm_state_machine_work() and re-arms port->state_machine_timer for the
remaining time if the work item was re-queued early.

> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> index d721baef52104..0a19b7665555b 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> @@ -6569,6 +6569,18 @@ static void tcpm_state_machine_work(struct kthread_work *work)
>  
>  	/* If we were queued due to a delayed state change, update it now */
>  	if (port->delayed_state) {
> +		/*
> +		 * The work may have been queued again for another reason
> +		 * while it was running, for instance by tcpm_init() at port
> +		 * registration, which sets two states in a row with the
> +		 * port lock held. Do not cut a pending delay short; re-arm
> +		 * the timer for the time that is left.
> +		 */
> +		if (ktime_after(port->delayed_runtime, ktime_get())) {
> +			hrtimer_start(&port->state_machine_timer,
> +				      port->delayed_runtime, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
> +			goto done;
> +		}

[Severity: Critical]
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but can
state_machine_timer_handler() trigger a use-after-free on port->wq during
tcpm_unregister_port() [1]?

drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c:state_machine_timer_handler() {
	if (port->registered)
		kthread_queue_work(port->wq, &port->state_machine);
	return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
}

drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c:tcpm_unregister_port() {
	port->registered = false;
	kthread_destroy_worker(port->wq);
	port->wq = NULL;

	hrtimer_cancel(&port->vdm_discovery_timer);
	hrtimer_cancel(&port->enable_frs_timer);
	hrtimer_cancel(&port->vdm_state_machine_timer);
	hrtimer_cancel(&port->state_machine_timer);
    ...
}

Because tcpm_unregister_port() destroys port->wq before cancelling the
hrtimers, an expiring timer on another CPU can pass the port->registered
check and queue work onto the freed worker:

CPU0                              CPU1
tcpm_unregister_port()            state_machine_timer_handler()
                                    if (port->registered)
  port->registered = false;
  kthread_destroy_worker(port->wq);
                                    kthread_queue_work(port->wq, ...);
                                      <-- use-after-free
  hrtimer_cancel(&port->state_machine_timer);

Cancelling the hrtimers after setting port->registered = false and before
calling kthread_destroy_worker(port->wq) would avoid this race.

[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-3223298d-cf35-4f30-825a-9241513c9ba5

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261110-tcpm-attach-reboot-v1-0-7657cc1e2dca@gmail.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-10 10:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-10 10:39 [PATCH 0/3] usb: typec: Find a Type-C partner after a warm reboot on the Orange Pi 5 Arun Iyengar
2026-11-10 10:39 ` Arun Iyengar via B4 Relay
2026-11-10 10:39 ` Arun Iyengar via B4 Relay
2026-11-10 10:39 ` [PATCH 1/3] usb: typec: tcpm: Don't cut a pending state delay short on a re-queue Arun Iyengar
2026-11-10 10:39   ` Arun Iyengar via B4 Relay
2026-11-10 10:39   ` Arun Iyengar via B4 Relay
2026-11-10 10:52   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-10 10:39 ` [PATCH 2/3] usb: typec: fusb302: Toggle with the default Rp current Arun Iyengar
2026-11-10 10:39   ` Arun Iyengar via B4 Relay
2026-11-10 10:39   ` Arun Iyengar via B4 Relay
2026-11-10 10:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 10:39 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: Mark the Orange Pi 5/5B Type-C port self-powered Arun Iyengar
2026-11-10 10:39   ` Arun Iyengar via B4 Relay
2026-11-10 10:39   ` Arun Iyengar via B4 Relay
2026-11-10 10:47   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-206898@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=aiyengar1990@gmail.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.