From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] smack: Use security_capable_lsm() for privilege checks
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 20:45:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-207727@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110203042.2410140-5-mic@digikod.net>
> smack_privileged_cred() checks the capabilities that guard Smack policy
> (CAP_MAC_ADMIN to change it, CAP_MAC_OVERRIDE to bypass it, and
> CAP_SYS_PTRACE for the ptrace rule) with cap_capable() instead of
> capable(), so that other stacked LSMs are not asked (see commit
> f28e783ff668 ("Smack: Use cap_capable in privilege check")). This also
> lets a process in a Landlock domain that denies these capabilities
> manage or bypass Smack policy.
>
> Switch this check to security_capable_lsm(), as for AppArmor in the
> previous commit. The onlycap rule still applies.
> smack_privileged_cred() may check another task's credentials (the
> tracer's for the ptrace rule, the SIGIO recipient's), and may run in
> interrupt context for SIGIO delivery, which the capable_lsm hook allows.
>
> Smack passes CAP_OPT_NONE everywhere, so Landlock logs every denial of
> these capabilities like any other capability denial. This includes the
> checks that some Smack hooks make before their label rules (e.g.
> smack_syslog(), smack_unix_may_send()): the override is denied, and the
> label rules then decide.
>
> Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
> Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com>
> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
> Fixes: 97c8386f1d74 ("landlock: Enforce capability restrictions")
> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261110203042.2410140-1-mic@digikod.net?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 20:30 [PATCH 0/6] Fix Landlock mediation of capabilities guarding LSM policies Mickaël Salaün
2026-11-10 20:30 ` [PATCH 1/6] lsm: Add a capable_lsm hook for capabilities guarding an LSM's policy Mickaël Salaün
2026-11-10 20:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 20:30 ` [PATCH 2/6] landlock: Restrict capabilities guarding other LSMs' policies Mickaël Salaün
2026-11-10 20:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 20:30 ` [PATCH 3/6] apparmor: Use security_capable_lsm() for policy capabilities Mickaël Salaün
2026-11-10 20:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 20:30 ` [PATCH 4/6] smack: Use security_capable_lsm() for privilege checks Mickaël Salaün
2026-11-10 20:45 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-10 20:30 ` [PATCH 5/6] selinux: Use security_capable_lsm() for CAP_MAC_ADMIN checks Mickaël Salaün
2026-11-10 20:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 20:30 ` [PATCH 6/6] selftests/landlock: Test capabilities guarding other LSMs' policies Mickaël Salaün
2026-11-10 21:02 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-207727@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.