All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Mani Tofigh" <mt4022@columbia.edu>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ext4: fix directory count after fast commit replay
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 00:13:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-209888@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261111-ext4-fc-replay-mkdir-v1-1-4b20be29aed8@columbia.edu>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Medium] ext4: unaligned memory access on raw_fc_inode in
  ext4_fc_replay_inode()
It also noticed 1 related pre-existing issue this patch does not
introduce:
- [Critical] ext4: unpropagated parent lookup error in
  ext4_fc_replay_link_internal() [1]
--

commit da3b7bd74825f337c491fafdca323cce067546e9
Author: Mani Tofigh <mt4022@columbia.edu>

ext4: fix directory count after fast commit replay

This commit passes the inode mode to ext4_mark_inode_used() so that fast
commit replay increments bg_used_dirs_count when marking a directory inode
in use, and moves the ext4_iget() lookup in ext4_fc_replay_create() ahead
of ext4_mark_inode_used().

> diff --git a/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c b/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
> index 0cac890cf3702..0eac7be3f58c2 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
> @@ -1984,7 +1984,7 @@ static int ext4_fc_replay_inode(struct super_block *sb,
>  	ret = sync_dirty_buffer(iloc.bh);
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto out_brelse;
> -	ret = ext4_mark_inode_used(sb, ino);
> +	ret = ext4_mark_inode_used(sb, ino, le16_to_cpu(raw_fc_inode->i_mode));
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto out_brelse;
>  

[Severity: Medium]
Can dereferencing raw_fc_inode->i_mode trigger an unaligned memory access
fault on strict-alignment architectures?

Fast commit TLVs are packed contiguously without alignment padding, so an
earlier dentry tag with an odd-length filename places subsequent
EXT4_FC_TAG_INODE payloads and raw_fc_inode at an odd byte offset.
ext4_fc_replay_inode() already copies raw_fc_inode into the aligned
raw_inode buffer earlier in the function, so reading raw_inode->i_mode
instead avoids the unaligned load.

> @@ -2041,11 +2041,6 @@ static int ext4_fc_replay_create(struct super_block *sb,
>  	trace_ext4_fc_replay(sb, EXT4_FC_TAG_CREAT, darg.ino,
>  			darg.parent_ino, darg.dname_len);
>  
> -	/* This takes care of update group descriptor and other metadata */
> -	ret = ext4_mark_inode_used(sb, darg.ino);
> -	if (ret)
> -		goto out;
> -
>  	inode = ext4_iget(sb, darg.ino, EXT4_IGET_NORMAL);
>  	if (IS_ERR(inode)) {
>  		ext4_debug("inode %d not found.", darg.ino);
> @@ -2054,6 +2049,11 @@ static int ext4_fc_replay_create(struct super_block *sb,
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* This takes care of update group descriptor and other metadata */
> +	ret = ext4_mark_inode_used(sb, darg.ino, inode->i_mode);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out;
> +
>  	if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
>  		/*
>  		 * If we are creating a directory, we need to make sure that the

[Severity: Critical]
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but does
ext4_fc_replay_link_internal() [1] silently return 0 when looking up
the parent directory fails?

fs/ext4/fast_commit.c:ext4_fc_replay_link_internal() {
	...
	int ret = 0;

	dir = ext4_iget(sb, darg->parent_ino, EXT4_IGET_NORMAL);
	if (IS_ERR(dir)) {
		ext4_debug("Dir with inode %d not found.", darg->parent_ino);
		dir = NULL;
		goto out;
	}
	...
out:
	if (dir)
		iput(dir);

	return ret;
}

When ext4_fc_replay_create() calls ext4_fc_replay_link_internal() and the
parent lookup fails, it receives 0 and proceeds to set i_nlink to 1 and
mark the inode dirty, leaving an unlinked inode and inconsistent metadata
instead of aborting recovery.

[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-f99925c6-c893-41e7-947b-8df2ac40e92c

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261111-ext4-fc-replay-mkdir-v1-0-4b20be29aed8@columbia.edu?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-12  0:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-11 23:02 [PATCH 0/3] ext4: fix counts left by fast commit replay of a mkdir Mani Tofigh
2026-11-11 23:02 ` Mani Tofigh via B4 Relay
2026-11-11 23:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] ext4: fix directory count after fast commit replay Mani Tofigh
2026-11-11 23:02   ` Mani Tofigh via B4 Relay
2026-11-12  0:13   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-11 23:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] ext4: fix directory i_blocks " Mani Tofigh
2026-11-11 23:02   ` Mani Tofigh via B4 Relay
2026-11-12  0:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 23:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] ext4: fix directory link counts " Mani Tofigh
2026-11-11 23:02   ` Mani Tofigh via B4 Relay
2026-11-12  0:16   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-209888@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mt4022@columbia.edu \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.