All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arvind Yadav" <arvind.yadav@intel.com>,
	intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] CI_ONLY: Hold a device reference across deferred VM
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 15:15:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-211419@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261112150302.3837896-2-arvind.yadav@intel.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [High] drm/xe: self-deadlock in vm_destroy_work_func() on
  xe->destroy_wq
--

commit a82e5f7cac31a25d1e51cdc2f9e9c8bed2db07a4
Author: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav@intel.com>

CI_ONLY: Hold a device reference across deferred VM

This commit acquires a drm_device reference in xe_vm_free() and releases
it at the end of vm_destroy_work_func() so the device remains valid across
deferred VM destruction.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> index dd855876f571c..d94a27db2cf40 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> @@ -2109,6 +2109,8 @@ static void vm_destroy_work_func(struct work_struct *w)
>  		xe_file_put(vm->xef);
>  
>  	kfree(vm);
> +
> +	drm_dev_put(&xe->drm);
>  }
>  
>  static void xe_vm_free(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm)
> @@ -2116,10 +2118,13 @@ static void xe_vm_free(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm)
>  	struct xe_vm *vm = container_of(gpuvm, struct xe_vm, gpuvm);
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * To destroy the VM we need to be able to sleep.
> -	 * drm_gpuvm keeps at least one device reference at this
> -	 * point so xe->destroy_wq must still be alive.
> +	 * drm_gpuvm drops its device reference as soon as this callback
> +	 * returns, but vm_destroy_work_func() still uses device state. Hold a
> +	 * reference across the deferred work.
>  	 */
> +	drm_dev_get(&vm->xe->drm);
> +
> +	/* To destroy the VM we need to be able to sleep */
>  	queue_work(vm->xe->destroy_wq, &vm->destroy_work);
>  }

[Severity: High]
Can dropping the last drm_device reference in vm_destroy_work_func()
self-deadlock on xe->destroy_wq?

When the freed VM holds the final device reference (for example, after PCI
device unbind), drm_gpuvm_free() drops its reference as soon as
xe_vm_free() returns, leaving the reference taken here as the last one.
When vm_destroy_work_func() runs on xe->destroy_wq and calls
drm_dev_put(&xe->drm), it synchronously triggers drm_dev_release() ->
drm_managed_release() -> xe_device_destroy():

drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c:xe_device_destroy() {
	...
	if (xe->destroy_wq)
		destroy_workqueue(xe->destroy_wq);
	...
}

destroy_workqueue(xe->destroy_wq) then tries to drain xe->destroy_wq from
inside vm_destroy_work_func() running on that same workqueue, triggering a
lockdep recursive-locking warning and hanging forever waiting for the
current work item to finish.

As done in vma_destroy_cb(), vm->destroy_work should be queued on the
module-wide destroy workqueue via xe_destroy_wq_queue(&vm->destroy_work);
a later patch in this series, commit "CI-ONLY:Defer VM teardown until exec
queue cleanup", makes that change, which is needed here to avoid breaking
bisectability.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261112150302.3837896-1-arvind.yadav@intel.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-12 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-12 15:02 [PATCH 0/3] CI-ONLY Fix VM teardown and migration queue recovery Arvind Yadav
2026-11-12 15:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] CI_ONLY: Hold a device reference across deferred VM Arvind Yadav
2026-11-12 15:15   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-12 15:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] CI_ONLY Mark VMs as closing before queue cleanup Arvind Yadav
2026-11-12 15:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] CI-ONLY:Defer VM teardown until exec " Arvind Yadav
2026-11-12 15:38 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for CI-ONLY Fix VM teardown and migration queue recovery Patchwork
2026-11-12 16:22 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-211419@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=arvind.yadav@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.