Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] ARM: dts: zynq: Add ALINX AX7Z020B development board

[sashiko-bot@kernel.org]

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Low] ARM: dts: zynq: undocumented alinx vendor prefix in compatible
  strings
--

commit 1804279139c8a09d5adf9d31bc9b1cefc4e9cf27
Author: Pufan Jin <cyan2254650260@gmail.com>

ARM: dts: zynq: Add ALINX AX7Z020B development board

This commit adds devicetree support for the ALINX AC7Z020 system on module
and the ALINX AX7Z020B development board.

> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/xilinx/zynq-alinx-ac7z020.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/xilinx/zynq-alinx-ac7z020.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..d60e58657b7c0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/xilinx/zynq-alinx-ac7z020.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * DTS for ALINX AC7Z020 System on Module
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2026 Pufan Jin <cyan2254650260@gmail.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include "zynq-7000.dtsi"
> +
> +/ {
> +	compatible = "alinx,ac7z020", "xlnx,zynq-7000";

[Severity: Low]
Should the "alinx" vendor prefix be documented in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml?

Both this file and arch/arm/boot/dts/xilinx/zynq-alinx-ax7z020b.dts
("alinx,ax7z020b") use the "alinx" prefix, which is not yet registered in
vendor-prefixes.yaml, causing scripts/checkpatch.pl to warn about an
undocumented DT string.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261112193245.250149-1-cyan2254650260@gmail.com?part=2