All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Chris Mason" <mason@kernel.org>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tytso@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/14] fs: validate atomic writes after O_APPEND and limits
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 22:16:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-211896@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261112214604.67875-6-mason@kernel.org>

> An RWF_ATOMIC write on XFS with reflink can expose stale disk contents
> if O_APPEND or RLIMIT_FSIZE leaves it sector aligned but not block
> aligned.
> 
> XFS and ext4 call generic_atomic_write_valid() on the range that the
> caller passed. But generic_write_checks() changes the range later:
> O_APPEND moves the position, and RLIMIT_FSIZE cuts the length. XFS can
> then fill only a part of a new block, and still map the whole block into
> the file:
> 
>     block size 4096, i_size 512, O_APPEND
>     validated:        0 to 4095
>     written:          512 to 4607
>     new blocks:       0 to 8191
>     stale below EOF:  0 to 511
> 
> The fix used here is to validate an atomic write in
> generic_write_checks(), after its range is final, and to refuse one that
> was cut. XFS no longer picks the path of an atomic write by the
> alignment of the range that the caller passed.
> 
> Fixes: f096207d3276 ("xfs: Validate atomic writes")
> Fixes: 43c696f9d094 ("ext4: Check for atomic writes support in write iter")
> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <mason@kernel.org>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261112214604.67875-1-mason@kernel.org?part=5


  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-12 22:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-12 21:46 [PATCH v9 00/14] reflink and atomic write bugs Chris Mason
2026-11-12 21:46 ` [PATCH v9 01/14] xfs: don't skip the flush before shifting extents Chris Mason
2026-11-12 21:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 21:46 ` [PATCH v9 02/14] xfs: flush the shifted range before changing the file Chris Mason
2026-11-12 21:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 21:46 ` [PATCH v9 03/14] xfs: don't change the block map under a dirty folio Chris Mason
2026-11-12 22:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 21:46 ` [PATCH v9 04/14] iomap: don't punch delalloc under a dirty EOF block Chris Mason
2026-11-12 21:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 21:46 ` [PATCH v9 05/14] fs: validate atomic writes after O_APPEND and limits Chris Mason
2026-11-12 22:16   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-12 21:46 ` [PATCH v9 06/14] xfs: recheck direct write alignment after write checks Chris Mason
2026-11-12 22:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 21:46 ` [PATCH v9 07/14] xfs: test for reflink after the dio " Chris Mason
2026-11-12 21:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 21:46 ` [PATCH v9 08/14] xfs: refuse writes to files racing with realtime inode flag changes Chris Mason
2026-11-12 22:11   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 21:46 ` [PATCH v9 09/14] xfs: test for always COW after the dio write checks Chris Mason
2026-11-12 21:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 21:46 ` [PATCH v9 10/14] xfs: refuse fallocate racing with realtime flag changes Chris Mason
2026-11-12 22:11   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 21:46 ` [PATCH v9 11/14] xfs: take the MMAPLOCK in xfs_fileattr_set() Chris Mason
2026-11-12 22:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 21:46 ` [PATCH v9 12/14] xfs: restart faults racing with realtime flag changes Chris Mason
2026-11-12 22:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 21:46 ` [PATCH v9 13/14] xfs: don't enable DAX on zoned inodes Chris Mason
2026-11-12 22:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 21:46 ` [PATCH v9 14/14] xfs: test for realtime and reflink under the pNFS locks Chris Mason
2026-11-12 22:02   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-211896@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mason@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.