From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Breno Leitao" <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] selftests: net: getsockopt_iter: cover tcp
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 17:07:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-213276@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261112-getsockopt_phase7-v1-3-1eb759dd0929@debian.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Low] selftests: net: nodelay_undersize_clamped() uses optlen=1 and
cannot test clamping vs 1-byte shrink
--
commit d0de5c7edf661839608cbe0dcd2d478b9815dc91
Author: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
selftests: net: getsockopt_iter: cover tcp
This commit adds a kselftest fixture covering do_tcp_getsockopt() across
exact, undersized, and oversized option buffers.
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/getsockopt_iter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/getsockopt_iter.c
> index 2367fce226d4c..4e51c8aa6a855 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/getsockopt_iter.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/getsockopt_iter.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1005,4 +1008,246 @@ TEST_F(tls, bad_optname)
[ ... ]
> +/* Unlike IPv4, TCP clamps the reply rather than shrinking it to a byte. */
> +TEST_F(tcp, nodelay_undersize_clamped)
> +{
> + socklen_t optlen = 1;
> + int val = 0;
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, getsockopt(self->fd, IPPROTO_TCP, TCP_NODELAY, &val,
> + &optlen));
> + ASSERT_EQ(1, optlen);
> +}
[Severity: Low]
Does passing optlen = 1 in nodelay_undersize_clamped() distinguish clamping to
optlen from shrinking a sub-int reply to a single byte? Both min_t(unsigned
int, len, sizeof(int)) in do_tcp_getsockopt() and the single-byte fallback in
do_ip_getsockopt() report optlen == 1 when called with a 1-byte buffer, so
passing optlen = 2 or 3 is needed to test the behavior described in the
comment.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261112-getsockopt_phase7-v1-0-1eb759dd0929@debian.org?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-13 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-12 17:05 [PATCH net-next 0/3] tcp: convert the SOL_TCP getsockopt path to sockopt_t Breno Leitao
2026-11-12 17:05 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] net/tcp-ao: convert the getsockopt helpers " Breno Leitao
2026-11-13 20:21 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-11-12 17:05 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] tcp: convert do_tcp_getsockopt() " Breno Leitao
2026-11-13 17:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 20:21 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-11-12 17:05 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] selftests: net: getsockopt_iter: cover tcp Breno Leitao
2026-11-13 17:07 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-13 20:22 ` Stanislav Fomichev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-213276@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.