From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794712876; b=JEk/6ONqWCGEXTh38znvH3iCNQYNfDf4Wu2Jx/21X/3uf3cnlTFW/smW0tWrAATNx5iQ /hdqgQuAF9bjrLqG/ebXub3jEW6ZVQuVw6ygG2XVk2IQh4hv/D7JYR8LwYHRIYf1ZceWd LFdRyu0rNHA+RNlOVK5FsWzRC/eSuW3jywspvqXTtQh/Vey6hg1YuEKXXysDI2/z24i5m fvXRt7/NnSC1tfCEplAYqjn8lTg7nZoq9xbrzq33pmWxP9zJC18rvAkORtTdMHSB7Lr5/ nSuOul8eHafeD6FCo4Mu6Tb4N/s2MjpM2L69CJekvQguknk3HM8yDEM2Y/YQm/LABFA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794712876; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date; bh=hWaDPELek1zrapKISJDTc7LpqP2hw36q2gX9VgTDwB4=; b=L+FRKS+Dw/8hX3QDXPlpVP775/rAboQcMEE2UBllcfe4lfgNujEnJzw/18364St1BVpW oDWmPtTt9Rq3hcEejS4DSorFkm8wXBJjClegytTXF1VfUn94ba0dedyhZwNBkZMVzqgsQ bcbn69hDB2MgJnX2JznLu+nzhrqBIF7EsdPRzVtMEceP/gLNLWOMjQ/gVTObhJz06iVe3 NAlTmWoofAV8y830bDtx1AgZR15qaNLuqa7/1+cNtFNh93RCekHMW8bJNQZ2q/z6KYWDO tHDa2lwPdhWqge6BpKgfaqARSV7zlOgkrjmkV4aeId5G4lK13/GDZJdDh+fzgfGh4sw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=awyBbef1; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CDC4606A889 for ; Sun, 15 Nov 2026 03:21:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=awyBbef1 Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B291C1F000C6; Sun, 15 Nov 2026 03:21:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1794712876; bh=hWaDPELek1zrapKISJDTc7LpqP2hw36q2gX9VgTDwB4=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=awyBbef1IUtYVZmWo3VVw9xd6Jf6xFNcnJ7IOlxZc43yWkw735voVSFvGyUi/X/Dh 9QExqIxBBBJx1nQiOOFVxULQFV6nwZ2vmTd8K1De/aKJ/dBH2ZXh7+wet6LrzRdAtS WGcpibLNDEQxHxSATJnbnk+JeXqrItAd2fXtdZdsi5l5q/NaR7FbFdpWINSpiuMjBn ATM2ErQaKuy1Z7ShK+gA+oqnjGqOytL+1uuP9GPIc6Z/1Ilb40vbOwhZCvdqBjEWsD xN22Cp4Gi387SRo8UJNFgrBJyXCgRZ4qtS7X+Wdpa19cmEj0G25ECjBSCg02+WVhaj xSp/oGeduzJ6g== Message-ID: From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 8/8] selftests/vsock: test the netns assign privilege checks Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Bobby Eshleman" Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , "Eugenio Perez" In-Reply-To: <20261113-vsock-guest-ns-v6-8-3737ce4673c0@meta.com> References: <20261113-vsock-guest-ns-v6-0-3737ce4673c0@meta.com> <20261113-vsock-guest-ns-v6-8-3737ce4673c0@meta.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2026 03:21:15 +0000 X-Mailing-List: virtualization@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list > VSOCK_CMD_DEV_NETNS_SET refuses callers without CAP_NET_ADMIN in the > init user namespace. >=20 > Add two tests: one confirms that CAP_NET_ADMIN is required even by a > privileged user and the other confirms that CAP_NET_ADMIN in an > unprivileged user ns alone is insufficient. >=20 > CONFIG_USER_NS is needed to test the CAP_NET_ADMIN + unprivileged user > ns case. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261113-vsock-gues= t-ns-v6-0-3737ce4673c0@meta.com?part=3D8