From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <owner-parisc-linux@dsl2.external.hp.com>
Received: from ns.zrt.nl (ns.zrt.nl [212.153.94.193])
	by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0190C4837
	for <parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org>; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 00:30:38 -0600 (MDT)
Received: (from fwmaster@localhost) by ns.zrt.nl (8.9.1a/8.6.12) id IAA02801 for <parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org>; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 08:30:37 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <sbb2e347.075@ms-zrt1>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 08:25:35 +0200
From: "Jurriaan Kalkman" <Jurriaan.Kalkman@zrt.nl>
To: <parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org>
Subject: Betr.: Re: [parisc-linux] How to merge Kernel 2.4.9 for hppa
	and new kernel 2.4.10
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
List-ID: <linux-parisc.vger.kernel.org>

>Getting a bit off-topic - but apart from keeping a careful eye on the
>linux-kernel list, does there exist any reasonable means of finding out
>stuff like this?  Mainly known flaws in a given kernel release ... such
>as 'serious VM problems in 2.4.10', 'foobar was badly broken in 2.4.6'
>and so on.
>
The linux weekly news (www.lwn.net) always has a short item about 'kernel =
mailing-
list threads', which mentions the top threads from the past week. I'm not =
sure if that
helps. I just follow the list :-)

Good luck,
Jurriaan