From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: Re: [autofs] VFS: Busy inodes after unmount on 2 way SMP Date: 18 Sep 2003 01:52:05 -0400 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: <3F689E40.6090802@intel.com> <3F68C6EB.2080706@zytor.com> <20030917210023.GA15099@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20030917210023.GA15099@suse.de> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Olaf Hering Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Arun Sharma , autofs@linux.kernel.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, Ian Kent >>>>> " " == Olaf Hering writes: > On Wed, Sep 17, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> Okay... let me ask this so I get it straight... >> >> Has anyone seen this (busy inodes after stopping the >> automounter) using autofs v3 kernel module and daemon? > I'm not sure, but everyone who has seen this should fiddle this > patch into the kernel and see how it goes. The whole thing > started very recently (post 2.4.21) for us. > This patch is untested, any feedback appreciated. ...and is indeed wrong... It does the exact opposite of what sillydelete should do. Instead of causing the last application that closes the file to perform the sillydelete, you are asking the *first* application that closes it to do so. Sillydelete *has* to be tied to dentries. Not files, and not inodes. It is purely a namespace operation... So exactly what are you trying to do, and why? Cheers, Trond ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs