From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: Samuel Maftoul <maftoul@esrf.fr>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NFS problem
Date: 22 Nov 2001 13:32:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <shsd72bgf4i.fsf@charged.uio.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011122095251.A18254@pcmaftoul.esrf.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20011122095251.A18254@pcmaftoul.esrf.fr>
>>>>> " " == Samuel Maftoul <maftoul@esrf.fr> writes:
> I thought that NFS's underlying FS do not have any effect on
> NFS performances, and that the client is not aware of the
> ("local") remote FS. Am I wrong ? Does anybody have an idea to
> fix the problem ?
Why do you think that something on the client is 'aware' of the remote
fs?
My guess is that you need to redo your test using a TCP mount for the
Linux machine (that's what your Solaris client is doing). My guess is
that you are hitting a UDP transport reliability problem in the
DirectIO case...
> Is it a bug in NFS's implementation of linux kernel ?
No.
Cheers,
Trond
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-22 12:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-22 8:52 NFS problem Samuel Maftoul
2001-11-22 12:32 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-01-25 14:31 nfs problem Arnau Bria
2007-01-25 15:22 ` Arnau Bria
2007-01-25 14:30 Arnau Bria
[not found] <5wdAz-5a0-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-01-18 13:55 ` NFS problem Bodo Eggert
2006-01-18 14:58 ` Ram Gupta
2006-01-18 4:52 Conio sandiago
2005-06-03 15:27 nfs problem vadivel vadi
2002-12-12 23:57 NFS Problem Jose Santiago
2002-12-11 11:41 Muhammad Sibtain Bashir
2002-10-18 10:16 nfs problem Muhammad Faisal Rauf Danka
2002-10-15 15:34 NFS Problem Victor Zamora
2002-10-12 10:40 nfs problem Mohammed Khalid Ansari
2002-10-12 12:13 ` Ramasubramanian
2002-10-16 5:18 ` Mohammed Khalid Ansari
2002-10-16 14:10 ` Mat Harris
2002-10-17 4:40 ` Mohammed Khalid Ansari
2002-10-17 9:06 ` Paul Furness
2002-10-18 10:10 ` Mohammed Khalid Ansari
2002-10-18 12:01 ` Paul Furness
2002-10-18 14:02 ` Paul Furness
2002-08-21 0:01 NFS problem Suresh Chadive
2002-08-21 2:54 ` Joseph L. Hood
2002-08-21 18:45 ` Suresh Chadive
2002-08-21 19:15 ` Patrick O'Reilly
2002-08-21 15:30 ` Patrick O'Reilly
2002-08-13 11:44 nfs problem george drossos
2000-09-26 9:05 NFS problem t.shantha.laxmi
2000-09-27 10:53 ` Jari
2000-09-25 23:08 clark
2000-09-25 19:23 Navin Boppuri
2000-01-28 13:08 kd
2000-01-28 13:04 Ralf HECKHAUSEN
2000-01-28 16:23 ` Wolfgang Denk
2000-01-28 12:47 Ralf HECKHAUSEN
1998-05-12 17:41 nfs problem Thomas Winder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=shsd72bgf4i.fsf@charged.uio.no \
--to=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maftoul@esrf.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.