From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: statd segfaults Date: 18 Feb 2003 10:30:11 +0100 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: <3E51D8C8.8000905@newdream.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16] ident=7411) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 18l450-0001B4-00 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 01:30:22 -0800 To: michael In-Reply-To: <3E51D8C8.8000905@newdream.net> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: >>>>> " " == michael writes: > ) = 74 sendmsg(4, {msg_name(16)={sin_family=AF_INET, > sin_port=htons(2670), sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}}, > msg_iov(1)=[{"\336^\313\2\0\0\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., > 32}], msg_controllen=24, msg_control=0x8051c20, , msg_flags=0}, > 0) = 32 That looks a bit strange. Why would msg_controllen/msg_control be set on an RPC call? Are you sure that your statd is linked to the standard RPC library routines in glibc? Cheers, Trond ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs