From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: NFS/TCP patches against 2.4.18 have problems Date: 05 Jul 2002 14:41:28 +0200 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: <1025737993.1835.10.camel@plokta.s8.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from mons.uio.no ([129.240.130.14]) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17QSP5-0007kt-00 for ; Fri, 05 Jul 2002 05:41:39 -0700 To: Bryan O'Sullivan In-Reply-To: <1025737993.1835.10.camel@plokta.s8.com> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: >>>>> " " == Bryan O'Sullivan writes: > Hi, Trond - I've been taking a look at the following patches > from your web site: > linux-2.4.18-svc_tcp.dif.bz2 linux-2.4.18-rpc_tweaks.dif.bz2 > In the accompanying commentary, you mention that the rpc_tweaks > patch applies on top of the svc_tcp patch, but this is not the > case. I get two very substantial rejects, in net/sunrpc/xprt.c > and include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h. Yes. The rpc_tweaks patch also relies on some other changes. Most notably, it assumes that the 'ping' patch (and possibly 'rpc_bkl') have been applied... Cheers, Trond ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs