From: wenyang.linux@foxmail.com
To: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Wen Yang <wenyang.linux@foxmail.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Dylan Yudaken <dylany@fb.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
Fu Wei <wefu@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Michal Nazarewicz <m.nazarewicz@samsung.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] eventfd: use wait_event_interruptible_locked_irq() helper
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 02:29:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tencent_98334C552AB55C90FCE4523A327393DFF606@qq.com> (raw)
From: Wen Yang <wenyang.linux@foxmail.com>
wait_event_interruptible_locked_irq was introduced by commit 22c43c81a51e
("wait_event_interruptible_locked() interface"), but older code such as
eventfd_{write,read} still uses the open code implementation.
Inspired by commit 8120a8aadb20
("fs/timerfd.c: make use of wait_event_interruptible_locked_irq()"), this
patch replaces the open code implementation with a single macro call.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wenyang.linux@foxmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Dylan Yudaken <dylany@fb.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Cc: Fu Wei <wefu@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <m.nazarewicz@samsung.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
fs/eventfd.c | 41 +++++++----------------------------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/eventfd.c b/fs/eventfd.c
index 249ca6c0b784..95850a13ce8d 100644
--- a/fs/eventfd.c
+++ b/fs/eventfd.c
@@ -228,7 +228,6 @@ static ssize_t eventfd_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
struct eventfd_ctx *ctx = file->private_data;
__u64 ucnt = 0;
- DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
if (iov_iter_count(to) < sizeof(ucnt))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -239,23 +238,11 @@ static ssize_t eventfd_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->wqh.lock);
return -EAGAIN;
}
- __add_wait_queue(&ctx->wqh, &wait);
- for (;;) {
- set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
- if (ctx->count)
- break;
- if (signal_pending(current)) {
- __remove_wait_queue(&ctx->wqh, &wait);
- __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
- spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->wqh.lock);
- return -ERESTARTSYS;
- }
+
+ if (wait_event_interruptible_locked_irq(ctx->wqh, ctx->count)) {
spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->wqh.lock);
- schedule();
- spin_lock_irq(&ctx->wqh.lock);
+ return -ERESTARTSYS;
}
- __remove_wait_queue(&ctx->wqh, &wait);
- __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
}
eventfd_ctx_do_read(ctx, &ucnt);
current->in_eventfd = 1;
@@ -275,7 +262,6 @@ static ssize_t eventfd_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t c
struct eventfd_ctx *ctx = file->private_data;
ssize_t res;
__u64 ucnt;
- DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
if (count < sizeof(ucnt))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -288,23 +274,10 @@ static ssize_t eventfd_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t c
if (ULLONG_MAX - ctx->count > ucnt)
res = sizeof(ucnt);
else if (!(file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)) {
- __add_wait_queue(&ctx->wqh, &wait);
- for (res = 0;;) {
- set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
- if (ULLONG_MAX - ctx->count > ucnt) {
- res = sizeof(ucnt);
- break;
- }
- if (signal_pending(current)) {
- res = -ERESTARTSYS;
- break;
- }
- spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->wqh.lock);
- schedule();
- spin_lock_irq(&ctx->wqh.lock);
- }
- __remove_wait_queue(&ctx->wqh, &wait);
- __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+ res = wait_event_interruptible_locked_irq(ctx->wqh,
+ ULLONG_MAX - ctx->count > ucnt);
+ if (!res)
+ res = sizeof(ucnt);
}
if (likely(res > 0)) {
ctx->count += ucnt;
--
2.37.2
next reply other threads:[~2023-02-16 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-16 18:29 wenyang.linux [this message]
2023-02-17 3:46 ` [PATCH v2] eventfd: use wait_event_interruptible_locked_irq() helper Eric Biggers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tencent_98334C552AB55C90FCE4523A327393DFF606@qq.com \
--to=wenyang.linux@foxmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=dylany@fb.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.nazarewicz@samsung.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wefu@redhat.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.