From: tip-bot for Nicolas Pitre <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
nicolas.pitre@linaro.org, hpa@zytor.com, nico@linaro.org,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched/deadline: Move DL related code from sched/core.c to sched/deadline.c
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 06:58:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-06a76fe08d4daaeea01ca0f175ad29f40c781ece@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170621182203.30626-2-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Commit-ID: 06a76fe08d4daaeea01ca0f175ad29f40c781ece
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/06a76fe08d4daaeea01ca0f175ad29f40c781ece
Author: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
AuthorDate: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 14:22:01 -0400
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:46:45 +0200
sched/deadline: Move DL related code from sched/core.c to sched/deadline.c
This helps making sched/core.c smaller and hopefully easier to understand and maintain.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170621182203.30626-2-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 343 +----------------------------------------------
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 344 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/sched/sched.h | 17 ++-
3 files changed, 364 insertions(+), 340 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 7faf4b3..54e1b07 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2140,25 +2140,6 @@ int wake_up_state(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state)
}
/*
- * This function clears the sched_dl_entity static params.
- */
-void __dl_clear_params(struct task_struct *p)
-{
- struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &p->dl;
-
- dl_se->dl_runtime = 0;
- dl_se->dl_deadline = 0;
- dl_se->dl_period = 0;
- dl_se->flags = 0;
- dl_se->dl_bw = 0;
- dl_se->dl_density = 0;
-
- dl_se->dl_throttled = 0;
- dl_se->dl_yielded = 0;
- dl_se->dl_non_contending = 0;
-}
-
-/*
* Perform scheduler related setup for a newly forked process p.
* p is forked by current.
*
@@ -2438,101 +2419,6 @@ unsigned long to_ratio(u64 period, u64 runtime)
return div64_u64(runtime << BW_SHIFT, period);
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-inline struct dl_bw *dl_bw_of(int i)
-{
- RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_sched_held(),
- "sched RCU must be held");
- return &cpu_rq(i)->rd->dl_bw;
-}
-
-inline int dl_bw_cpus(int i)
-{
- struct root_domain *rd = cpu_rq(i)->rd;
- int cpus = 0;
-
- RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_sched_held(),
- "sched RCU must be held");
- for_each_cpu_and(i, rd->span, cpu_active_mask)
- cpus++;
-
- return cpus;
-}
-#else
-inline struct dl_bw *dl_bw_of(int i)
-{
- return &cpu_rq(i)->dl.dl_bw;
-}
-
-inline int dl_bw_cpus(int i)
-{
- return 1;
-}
-#endif
-
-/*
- * We must be sure that accepting a new task (or allowing changing the
- * parameters of an existing one) is consistent with the bandwidth
- * constraints. If yes, this function also accordingly updates the currently
- * allocated bandwidth to reflect the new situation.
- *
- * This function is called while holding p's rq->lock.
- */
-static int dl_overflow(struct task_struct *p, int policy,
- const struct sched_attr *attr)
-{
-
- struct dl_bw *dl_b = dl_bw_of(task_cpu(p));
- u64 period = attr->sched_period ?: attr->sched_deadline;
- u64 runtime = attr->sched_runtime;
- u64 new_bw = dl_policy(policy) ? to_ratio(period, runtime) : 0;
- int cpus, err = -1;
-
- /* !deadline task may carry old deadline bandwidth */
- if (new_bw == p->dl.dl_bw && task_has_dl_policy(p))
- return 0;
-
- /*
- * Either if a task, enters, leave, or stays -deadline but changes
- * its parameters, we may need to update accordingly the total
- * allocated bandwidth of the container.
- */
- raw_spin_lock(&dl_b->lock);
- cpus = dl_bw_cpus(task_cpu(p));
- if (dl_policy(policy) && !task_has_dl_policy(p) &&
- !__dl_overflow(dl_b, cpus, 0, new_bw)) {
- if (hrtimer_active(&p->dl.inactive_timer))
- __dl_clear(dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw, cpus);
- __dl_add(dl_b, new_bw, cpus);
- err = 0;
- } else if (dl_policy(policy) && task_has_dl_policy(p) &&
- !__dl_overflow(dl_b, cpus, p->dl.dl_bw, new_bw)) {
- /*
- * XXX this is slightly incorrect: when the task
- * utilization decreases, we should delay the total
- * utilization change until the task's 0-lag point.
- * But this would require to set the task's "inactive
- * timer" when the task is not inactive.
- */
- __dl_clear(dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw, cpus);
- __dl_add(dl_b, new_bw, cpus);
- dl_change_utilization(p, new_bw);
- err = 0;
- } else if (!dl_policy(policy) && task_has_dl_policy(p)) {
- /*
- * Do not decrease the total deadline utilization here,
- * switched_from_dl() will take care to do it at the correct
- * (0-lag) time.
- */
- err = 0;
- }
- raw_spin_unlock(&dl_b->lock);
-
- return err;
-}
-
-extern void init_dl_bw(struct dl_bw *dl_b);
-
/*
* wake_up_new_task - wake up a newly created task for the first time.
*
@@ -4015,27 +3901,6 @@ static struct task_struct *find_process_by_pid(pid_t pid)
}
/*
- * This function initializes the sched_dl_entity of a newly becoming
- * SCHED_DEADLINE task.
- *
- * Only the static values are considered here, the actual runtime and the
- * absolute deadline will be properly calculated when the task is enqueued
- * for the first time with its new policy.
- */
-static void
-__setparam_dl(struct task_struct *p, const struct sched_attr *attr)
-{
- struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &p->dl;
-
- dl_se->dl_runtime = attr->sched_runtime;
- dl_se->dl_deadline = attr->sched_deadline;
- dl_se->dl_period = attr->sched_period ?: dl_se->dl_deadline;
- dl_se->flags = attr->sched_flags;
- dl_se->dl_bw = to_ratio(dl_se->dl_period, dl_se->dl_runtime);
- dl_se->dl_density = to_ratio(dl_se->dl_deadline, dl_se->dl_runtime);
-}
-
-/*
* sched_setparam() passes in -1 for its policy, to let the functions
* it calls know not to change it.
*/
@@ -4088,59 +3953,6 @@ static void __setscheduler(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
p->sched_class = &fair_sched_class;
}
-static void
-__getparam_dl(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_attr *attr)
-{
- struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &p->dl;
-
- attr->sched_priority = p->rt_priority;
- attr->sched_runtime = dl_se->dl_runtime;
- attr->sched_deadline = dl_se->dl_deadline;
- attr->sched_period = dl_se->dl_period;
- attr->sched_flags = dl_se->flags;
-}
-
-/*
- * This function validates the new parameters of a -deadline task.
- * We ask for the deadline not being zero, and greater or equal
- * than the runtime, as well as the period of being zero or
- * greater than deadline. Furthermore, we have to be sure that
- * user parameters are above the internal resolution of 1us (we
- * check sched_runtime only since it is always the smaller one) and
- * below 2^63 ns (we have to check both sched_deadline and
- * sched_period, as the latter can be zero).
- */
-static bool
-__checkparam_dl(const struct sched_attr *attr)
-{
- /* deadline != 0 */
- if (attr->sched_deadline == 0)
- return false;
-
- /*
- * Since we truncate DL_SCALE bits, make sure we're at least
- * that big.
- */
- if (attr->sched_runtime < (1ULL << DL_SCALE))
- return false;
-
- /*
- * Since we use the MSB for wrap-around and sign issues, make
- * sure it's not set (mind that period can be equal to zero).
- */
- if (attr->sched_deadline & (1ULL << 63) ||
- attr->sched_period & (1ULL << 63))
- return false;
-
- /* runtime <= deadline <= period (if period != 0) */
- if ((attr->sched_period != 0 &&
- attr->sched_period < attr->sched_deadline) ||
- attr->sched_deadline < attr->sched_runtime)
- return false;
-
- return true;
-}
-
/*
* Check the target process has a UID that matches the current process's:
*/
@@ -4157,19 +3969,6 @@ static bool check_same_owner(struct task_struct *p)
return match;
}
-static bool dl_param_changed(struct task_struct *p, const struct sched_attr *attr)
-{
- struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &p->dl;
-
- if (dl_se->dl_runtime != attr->sched_runtime ||
- dl_se->dl_deadline != attr->sched_deadline ||
- dl_se->dl_period != attr->sched_period ||
- dl_se->flags != attr->sched_flags)
- return true;
-
- return false;
-}
-
static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
const struct sched_attr *attr,
bool user, bool pi)
@@ -4350,7 +4149,7 @@ change:
* of a SCHED_DEADLINE task) we need to check if enough bandwidth
* is available.
*/
- if ((dl_policy(policy) || dl_task(p)) && dl_overflow(p, policy, attr)) {
+ if ((dl_policy(policy) || dl_task(p)) && sched_dl_overflow(p, policy, attr)) {
task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
return -EBUSY;
}
@@ -5456,23 +5255,12 @@ void init_idle(struct task_struct *idle, int cpu)
int cpuset_cpumask_can_shrink(const struct cpumask *cur,
const struct cpumask *trial)
{
- int ret = 1, trial_cpus;
- struct dl_bw *cur_dl_b;
- unsigned long flags;
+ int ret = 1;
if (!cpumask_weight(cur))
return ret;
- rcu_read_lock_sched();
- cur_dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpumask_any(cur));
- trial_cpus = cpumask_weight(trial);
-
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cur_dl_b->lock, flags);
- if (cur_dl_b->bw != -1 &&
- cur_dl_b->bw * trial_cpus < cur_dl_b->total_bw)
- ret = 0;
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cur_dl_b->lock, flags);
- rcu_read_unlock_sched();
+ ret = dl_cpuset_cpumask_can_shrink(cur, trial);
return ret;
}
@@ -5497,34 +5285,8 @@ int task_can_attach(struct task_struct *p,
}
if (dl_task(p) && !cpumask_intersects(task_rq(p)->rd->span,
- cs_cpus_allowed)) {
- unsigned int dest_cpu = cpumask_any_and(cpu_active_mask,
- cs_cpus_allowed);
- struct dl_bw *dl_b;
- bool overflow;
- int cpus;
- unsigned long flags;
-
- rcu_read_lock_sched();
- dl_b = dl_bw_of(dest_cpu);
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags);
- cpus = dl_bw_cpus(dest_cpu);
- overflow = __dl_overflow(dl_b, cpus, 0, p->dl.dl_bw);
- if (overflow)
- ret = -EBUSY;
- else {
- /*
- * We reserve space for this task in the destination
- * root_domain, as we can't fail after this point.
- * We will free resources in the source root_domain
- * later on (see set_cpus_allowed_dl()).
- */
- __dl_add(dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw, cpus);
- }
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
- rcu_read_unlock_sched();
-
- }
+ cs_cpus_allowed))
+ ret = dl_task_can_attach(p, cs_cpus_allowed);
out:
return ret;
@@ -5792,23 +5554,8 @@ static void cpuset_cpu_active(void)
static int cpuset_cpu_inactive(unsigned int cpu)
{
- unsigned long flags;
- struct dl_bw *dl_b;
- bool overflow;
- int cpus;
-
if (!cpuhp_tasks_frozen) {
- rcu_read_lock_sched();
- dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
-
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags);
- cpus = dl_bw_cpus(cpu);
- overflow = __dl_overflow(dl_b, cpus, 0, 0);
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
-
- rcu_read_unlock_sched();
-
- if (overflow)
+ if (dl_cpu_busy(cpu))
return -EBUSY;
cpuset_update_active_cpus();
} else {
@@ -6711,84 +6458,6 @@ static int sched_rt_global_constraints(void)
}
#endif /* CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED */
-static int sched_dl_global_validate(void)
-{
- u64 runtime = global_rt_runtime();
- u64 period = global_rt_period();
- u64 new_bw = to_ratio(period, runtime);
- struct dl_bw *dl_b;
- int cpu, ret = 0;
- unsigned long flags;
-
- /*
- * Here we want to check the bandwidth not being set to some
- * value smaller than the currently allocated bandwidth in
- * any of the root_domains.
- *
- * FIXME: Cycling on all the CPUs is overdoing, but simpler than
- * cycling on root_domains... Discussion on different/better
- * solutions is welcome!
- */
- for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
- rcu_read_lock_sched();
- dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
-
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags);
- if (new_bw < dl_b->total_bw)
- ret = -EBUSY;
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
-
- rcu_read_unlock_sched();
-
- if (ret)
- break;
- }
-
- return ret;
-}
-
-void init_dl_rq_bw_ratio(struct dl_rq *dl_rq)
-{
- if (global_rt_runtime() == RUNTIME_INF) {
- dl_rq->bw_ratio = 1 << RATIO_SHIFT;
- dl_rq->extra_bw = 1 << BW_SHIFT;
- } else {
- dl_rq->bw_ratio = to_ratio(global_rt_runtime(),
- global_rt_period()) >> (BW_SHIFT - RATIO_SHIFT);
- dl_rq->extra_bw = to_ratio(global_rt_period(),
- global_rt_runtime());
- }
-}
-
-static void sched_dl_do_global(void)
-{
- u64 new_bw = -1;
- struct dl_bw *dl_b;
- int cpu;
- unsigned long flags;
-
- def_dl_bandwidth.dl_period = global_rt_period();
- def_dl_bandwidth.dl_runtime = global_rt_runtime();
-
- if (global_rt_runtime() != RUNTIME_INF)
- new_bw = to_ratio(global_rt_period(), global_rt_runtime());
-
- /*
- * FIXME: As above...
- */
- for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
- rcu_read_lock_sched();
- dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
-
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags);
- dl_b->bw = new_bw;
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
-
- rcu_read_unlock_sched();
- init_dl_rq_bw_ratio(&cpu_rq(cpu)->dl);
- }
-}
-
static int sched_rt_global_validate(void)
{
if (sysctl_sched_rt_period <= 0)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index e12f859..a84299f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
#include "sched.h"
#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <uapi/linux/sched/types.h>
struct dl_bandwidth def_dl_bandwidth;
@@ -43,6 +44,38 @@ static inline int on_dl_rq(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
return !RB_EMPTY_NODE(&dl_se->rb_node);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+static inline struct dl_bw *dl_bw_of(int i)
+{
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_sched_held(),
+ "sched RCU must be held");
+ return &cpu_rq(i)->rd->dl_bw;
+}
+
+static inline int dl_bw_cpus(int i)
+{
+ struct root_domain *rd = cpu_rq(i)->rd;
+ int cpus = 0;
+
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_sched_held(),
+ "sched RCU must be held");
+ for_each_cpu_and(i, rd->span, cpu_active_mask)
+ cpus++;
+
+ return cpus;
+}
+#else
+static inline struct dl_bw *dl_bw_of(int i)
+{
+ return &cpu_rq(i)->dl.dl_bw;
+}
+
+static inline int dl_bw_cpus(int i)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+#endif
+
static inline
void add_running_bw(u64 dl_bw, struct dl_rq *dl_rq)
{
@@ -2318,6 +2351,317 @@ const struct sched_class dl_sched_class = {
.update_curr = update_curr_dl,
};
+int sched_dl_global_validate(void)
+{
+ u64 runtime = global_rt_runtime();
+ u64 period = global_rt_period();
+ u64 new_bw = to_ratio(period, runtime);
+ struct dl_bw *dl_b;
+ int cpu, ret = 0;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ /*
+ * Here we want to check the bandwidth not being set to some
+ * value smaller than the currently allocated bandwidth in
+ * any of the root_domains.
+ *
+ * FIXME: Cycling on all the CPUs is overdoing, but simpler than
+ * cycling on root_domains... Discussion on different/better
+ * solutions is welcome!
+ */
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ rcu_read_lock_sched();
+ dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags);
+ if (new_bw < dl_b->total_bw)
+ ret = -EBUSY;
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
+
+ rcu_read_unlock_sched();
+
+ if (ret)
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+void init_dl_rq_bw_ratio(struct dl_rq *dl_rq)
+{
+ if (global_rt_runtime() == RUNTIME_INF) {
+ dl_rq->bw_ratio = 1 << RATIO_SHIFT;
+ dl_rq->extra_bw = 1 << BW_SHIFT;
+ } else {
+ dl_rq->bw_ratio = to_ratio(global_rt_runtime(),
+ global_rt_period()) >> (BW_SHIFT - RATIO_SHIFT);
+ dl_rq->extra_bw = to_ratio(global_rt_period(),
+ global_rt_runtime());
+ }
+}
+
+void sched_dl_do_global(void)
+{
+ u64 new_bw = -1;
+ struct dl_bw *dl_b;
+ int cpu;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ def_dl_bandwidth.dl_period = global_rt_period();
+ def_dl_bandwidth.dl_runtime = global_rt_runtime();
+
+ if (global_rt_runtime() != RUNTIME_INF)
+ new_bw = to_ratio(global_rt_period(), global_rt_runtime());
+
+ /*
+ * FIXME: As above...
+ */
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ rcu_read_lock_sched();
+ dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags);
+ dl_b->bw = new_bw;
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
+
+ rcu_read_unlock_sched();
+ init_dl_rq_bw_ratio(&cpu_rq(cpu)->dl);
+ }
+}
+
+/*
+ * We must be sure that accepting a new task (or allowing changing the
+ * parameters of an existing one) is consistent with the bandwidth
+ * constraints. If yes, this function also accordingly updates the currently
+ * allocated bandwidth to reflect the new situation.
+ *
+ * This function is called while holding p's rq->lock.
+ */
+int sched_dl_overflow(struct task_struct *p, int policy,
+ const struct sched_attr *attr)
+{
+ struct dl_bw *dl_b = dl_bw_of(task_cpu(p));
+ u64 period = attr->sched_period ?: attr->sched_deadline;
+ u64 runtime = attr->sched_runtime;
+ u64 new_bw = dl_policy(policy) ? to_ratio(period, runtime) : 0;
+ int cpus, err = -1;
+
+ /* !deadline task may carry old deadline bandwidth */
+ if (new_bw == p->dl.dl_bw && task_has_dl_policy(p))
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Either if a task, enters, leave, or stays -deadline but changes
+ * its parameters, we may need to update accordingly the total
+ * allocated bandwidth of the container.
+ */
+ raw_spin_lock(&dl_b->lock);
+ cpus = dl_bw_cpus(task_cpu(p));
+ if (dl_policy(policy) && !task_has_dl_policy(p) &&
+ !__dl_overflow(dl_b, cpus, 0, new_bw)) {
+ if (hrtimer_active(&p->dl.inactive_timer))
+ __dl_clear(dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw, cpus);
+ __dl_add(dl_b, new_bw, cpus);
+ err = 0;
+ } else if (dl_policy(policy) && task_has_dl_policy(p) &&
+ !__dl_overflow(dl_b, cpus, p->dl.dl_bw, new_bw)) {
+ /*
+ * XXX this is slightly incorrect: when the task
+ * utilization decreases, we should delay the total
+ * utilization change until the task's 0-lag point.
+ * But this would require to set the task's "inactive
+ * timer" when the task is not inactive.
+ */
+ __dl_clear(dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw, cpus);
+ __dl_add(dl_b, new_bw, cpus);
+ dl_change_utilization(p, new_bw);
+ err = 0;
+ } else if (!dl_policy(policy) && task_has_dl_policy(p)) {
+ /*
+ * Do not decrease the total deadline utilization here,
+ * switched_from_dl() will take care to do it at the correct
+ * (0-lag) time.
+ */
+ err = 0;
+ }
+ raw_spin_unlock(&dl_b->lock);
+
+ return err;
+}
+
+/*
+ * This function initializes the sched_dl_entity of a newly becoming
+ * SCHED_DEADLINE task.
+ *
+ * Only the static values are considered here, the actual runtime and the
+ * absolute deadline will be properly calculated when the task is enqueued
+ * for the first time with its new policy.
+ */
+void __setparam_dl(struct task_struct *p, const struct sched_attr *attr)
+{
+ struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &p->dl;
+
+ dl_se->dl_runtime = attr->sched_runtime;
+ dl_se->dl_deadline = attr->sched_deadline;
+ dl_se->dl_period = attr->sched_period ?: dl_se->dl_deadline;
+ dl_se->flags = attr->sched_flags;
+ dl_se->dl_bw = to_ratio(dl_se->dl_period, dl_se->dl_runtime);
+ dl_se->dl_density = to_ratio(dl_se->dl_deadline, dl_se->dl_runtime);
+}
+
+void __getparam_dl(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_attr *attr)
+{
+ struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &p->dl;
+
+ attr->sched_priority = p->rt_priority;
+ attr->sched_runtime = dl_se->dl_runtime;
+ attr->sched_deadline = dl_se->dl_deadline;
+ attr->sched_period = dl_se->dl_period;
+ attr->sched_flags = dl_se->flags;
+}
+
+/*
+ * This function validates the new parameters of a -deadline task.
+ * We ask for the deadline not being zero, and greater or equal
+ * than the runtime, as well as the period of being zero or
+ * greater than deadline. Furthermore, we have to be sure that
+ * user parameters are above the internal resolution of 1us (we
+ * check sched_runtime only since it is always the smaller one) and
+ * below 2^63 ns (we have to check both sched_deadline and
+ * sched_period, as the latter can be zero).
+ */
+bool __checkparam_dl(const struct sched_attr *attr)
+{
+ /* deadline != 0 */
+ if (attr->sched_deadline == 0)
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * Since we truncate DL_SCALE bits, make sure we're at least
+ * that big.
+ */
+ if (attr->sched_runtime < (1ULL << DL_SCALE))
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * Since we use the MSB for wrap-around and sign issues, make
+ * sure it's not set (mind that period can be equal to zero).
+ */
+ if (attr->sched_deadline & (1ULL << 63) ||
+ attr->sched_period & (1ULL << 63))
+ return false;
+
+ /* runtime <= deadline <= period (if period != 0) */
+ if ((attr->sched_period != 0 &&
+ attr->sched_period < attr->sched_deadline) ||
+ attr->sched_deadline < attr->sched_runtime)
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+/*
+ * This function clears the sched_dl_entity static params.
+ */
+void __dl_clear_params(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &p->dl;
+
+ dl_se->dl_runtime = 0;
+ dl_se->dl_deadline = 0;
+ dl_se->dl_period = 0;
+ dl_se->flags = 0;
+ dl_se->dl_bw = 0;
+ dl_se->dl_density = 0;
+
+ dl_se->dl_throttled = 0;
+ dl_se->dl_yielded = 0;
+ dl_se->dl_non_contending = 0;
+}
+
+bool dl_param_changed(struct task_struct *p, const struct sched_attr *attr)
+{
+ struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &p->dl;
+
+ if (dl_se->dl_runtime != attr->sched_runtime ||
+ dl_se->dl_deadline != attr->sched_deadline ||
+ dl_se->dl_period != attr->sched_period ||
+ dl_se->flags != attr->sched_flags)
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+int dl_task_can_attach(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *cs_cpus_allowed)
+{
+ unsigned int dest_cpu = cpumask_any_and(cpu_active_mask,
+ cs_cpus_allowed);
+ struct dl_bw *dl_b;
+ bool overflow;
+ int cpus, ret;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ rcu_read_lock_sched();
+ dl_b = dl_bw_of(dest_cpu);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags);
+ cpus = dl_bw_cpus(dest_cpu);
+ overflow = __dl_overflow(dl_b, cpus, 0, p->dl.dl_bw);
+ if (overflow)
+ ret = -EBUSY;
+ else {
+ /*
+ * We reserve space for this task in the destination
+ * root_domain, as we can't fail after this point.
+ * We will free resources in the source root_domain
+ * later on (see set_cpus_allowed_dl()).
+ */
+ __dl_add(dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw, cpus);
+ ret = 0;
+ }
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
+ rcu_read_unlock_sched();
+ return ret;
+}
+
+int dl_cpuset_cpumask_can_shrink(const struct cpumask *cur,
+ const struct cpumask *trial)
+{
+ int ret = 1, trial_cpus;
+ struct dl_bw *cur_dl_b;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ rcu_read_lock_sched();
+ cur_dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpumask_any(cur));
+ trial_cpus = cpumask_weight(trial);
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cur_dl_b->lock, flags);
+ if (cur_dl_b->bw != -1 &&
+ cur_dl_b->bw * trial_cpus < cur_dl_b->total_bw)
+ ret = 0;
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cur_dl_b->lock, flags);
+ rcu_read_unlock_sched();
+ return ret;
+}
+
+bool dl_cpu_busy(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+ struct dl_bw *dl_b;
+ bool overflow;
+ int cpus;
+
+ rcu_read_lock_sched();
+ dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags);
+ cpus = dl_bw_cpus(cpu);
+ overflow = __dl_overflow(dl_b, cpus, 0, 0);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
+ rcu_read_unlock_sched();
+ return overflow;
+}
+#endif
+
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG
extern void print_dl_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct dl_rq *dl_rq);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index e0329d1..d4eb3f6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -218,9 +218,6 @@ static inline int dl_bandwidth_enabled(void)
return sysctl_sched_rt_runtime >= 0;
}
-extern struct dl_bw *dl_bw_of(int i);
-extern int dl_bw_cpus(int i);
-
struct dl_bw {
raw_spinlock_t lock;
u64 bw, total_bw;
@@ -251,6 +248,20 @@ bool __dl_overflow(struct dl_bw *dl_b, int cpus, u64 old_bw, u64 new_bw)
void dl_change_utilization(struct task_struct *p, u64 new_bw);
extern void init_dl_bw(struct dl_bw *dl_b);
+extern int sched_dl_global_validate(void);
+extern void sched_dl_do_global(void);
+extern int sched_dl_overflow(struct task_struct *p, int policy,
+ const struct sched_attr *attr);
+extern void __setparam_dl(struct task_struct *p, const struct sched_attr *attr);
+extern void __getparam_dl(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_attr *attr);
+extern bool __checkparam_dl(const struct sched_attr *attr);
+extern void __dl_clear_params(struct task_struct *p);
+extern bool dl_param_changed(struct task_struct *p, const struct sched_attr *attr);
+extern int dl_task_can_attach(struct task_struct *p,
+ const struct cpumask *cs_cpus_allowed);
+extern int dl_cpuset_cpumask_can_shrink(const struct cpumask *cur,
+ const struct cpumask *trial);
+extern bool dl_cpu_busy(unsigned int cpu);
#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-23 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-21 18:22 [PATCH 0/3] some scheduler code movements Nicolas Pitre
2017-06-21 18:22 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched/deadline: move dl related code out of sched/core.c Nicolas Pitre
2017-06-23 13:58 ` tip-bot for Nicolas Pitre [this message]
2017-06-21 18:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] sched/rt: move rt " Nicolas Pitre
2017-06-23 13:59 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/rt: Move RT related code from sched/core.c to sched/rt.c tip-bot for Nicolas Pitre
2017-06-21 18:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] futex: split PI support to a file of its own Nicolas Pitre
2017-06-22 8:31 ` [PATCH 0/3] some scheduler code movements Ingo Molnar
2017-06-22 12:33 ` Nicolas Pitre
2017-06-22 14:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-06-22 17:19 ` Nicolas Pitre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-06a76fe08d4daaeea01ca0f175ad29f40c781ece@git.kernel.org \
--to=tipbot@zytor.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=nico@linaro.org \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.