From: tip-bot for Jakub Jelen <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, jjelen@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
hpa@zytor.com, jakuje@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, acme@redhat.com,
mingo@kernel.org
Subject: [tip:perf/urgent] perf bench numa: Fix assertion for nodes bitfield
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 00:37:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-3c52b658b8e4fbbf7975932bbdc4798421dbcb15@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458388687-24421-1-git-send-email-jakuje@gmail.com>
Commit-ID: 3c52b658b8e4fbbf7975932bbdc4798421dbcb15
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/3c52b658b8e4fbbf7975932bbdc4798421dbcb15
Author: Jakub Jelen <jakuje@gmail.com>
AuthorDate: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 12:58:07 +0100
Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
CommitDate: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:46:57 -0300
perf bench numa: Fix assertion for nodes bitfield
Comparing bits and bytes in numa benchmark assertion
I hit the issue on two socket Power8 machine presenting its numa nodes
as 0,1,16,17 (according to numactl). Therefore I got error (and hang of
parent process):
perf: bench/numa.c:296: bind_to_memnode: Assertion `!(g->p.nr_nodes > (int)sizeof(nodemask))' failed.
This is obviously false positive. We can fit all the 18 nodes into
bitfield of 8 bytes (long on 64b architecture).
Signed-off-by: Jakub Jelen <jakuje@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jakub Jelen <jjelen@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: trivial@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1458388687-24421-1-git-send-email-jakuje@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
tools/perf/bench/numa.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
index 5049d63..7500d95 100644
--- a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
+++ b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static void bind_to_memnode(int node)
if (node == -1)
return;
- BUG_ON(g->p.nr_nodes > (int)sizeof(nodemask));
+ BUG_ON(g->p.nr_nodes > (int)sizeof(nodemask)*8);
nodemask = 1L << node;
ret = set_mempolicy(MPOL_BIND, &nodemask, sizeof(nodemask)*8);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-24 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-19 11:58 [PATCH] perf bench numa: Fix assertion for nodes bitfield Jakub Jelen
2016-03-21 20:49 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-03-24 7:37 ` tip-bot for Jakub Jelen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-3c52b658b8e4fbbf7975932bbdc4798421dbcb15@git.kernel.org \
--to=tipbot@zytor.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jakuje@gmail.com \
--cc=jjelen@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.