From: tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org, hpa@zytor.com,
mingo@redhat.com, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
acme@ghostprotocols.net, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: [tip:perf/urgent] perf events: Dont report side-band events on each cpu for per-task-per-cpu events
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:30:32 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-5d27c23df09b702868d9a3bff86ec6abd22963ac@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091217121830.215333434@chello.nl>
Commit-ID: 5d27c23df09b702868d9a3bff86ec6abd22963ac
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/5d27c23df09b702868d9a3bff86ec6abd22963ac
Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
AuthorDate: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:16:32 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:21:36 +0100
perf events: Dont report side-band events on each cpu for per-task-per-cpu events
Acme noticed that his FORK/MMAP numbers were inflated by about
the same factor as his cpu-count.
This led to the discovery of a few more sites that need to
respect the event->cpu filter.
Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
LKML-Reference: <20091217121830.215333434@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
kernel/perf_event.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/perf_event.c b/kernel/perf_event.c
index 8ab8698..03cc061 100644
--- a/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -1381,6 +1381,9 @@ static void perf_ctx_adjust_freq(struct perf_event_context *ctx)
if (event->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
continue;
+ if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ continue;
+
hwc = &event->hw;
interrupts = hwc->interrupts;
@@ -3265,6 +3268,9 @@ static void perf_event_task_output(struct perf_event *event,
static int perf_event_task_match(struct perf_event *event)
{
+ if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ return 0;
+
if (event->attr.comm || event->attr.mmap || event->attr.task)
return 1;
@@ -3290,12 +3296,11 @@ static void perf_event_task_event(struct perf_task_event *task_event)
rcu_read_lock();
cpuctx = &get_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
perf_event_task_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx, task_event);
- put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
-
if (!ctx)
ctx = rcu_dereference(task_event->task->perf_event_ctxp);
if (ctx)
perf_event_task_ctx(ctx, task_event);
+ put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
@@ -3372,6 +3377,9 @@ static void perf_event_comm_output(struct perf_event *event,
static int perf_event_comm_match(struct perf_event *event)
{
+ if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ return 0;
+
if (event->attr.comm)
return 1;
@@ -3408,15 +3416,10 @@ static void perf_event_comm_event(struct perf_comm_event *comm_event)
rcu_read_lock();
cpuctx = &get_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
perf_event_comm_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx, comm_event);
- put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
-
- /*
- * doesn't really matter which of the child contexts the
- * events ends up in.
- */
ctx = rcu_dereference(current->perf_event_ctxp);
if (ctx)
perf_event_comm_ctx(ctx, comm_event);
+ put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
@@ -3491,6 +3494,9 @@ static void perf_event_mmap_output(struct perf_event *event,
static int perf_event_mmap_match(struct perf_event *event,
struct perf_mmap_event *mmap_event)
{
+ if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ return 0;
+
if (event->attr.mmap)
return 1;
@@ -3564,15 +3570,10 @@ got_name:
rcu_read_lock();
cpuctx = &get_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
perf_event_mmap_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx, mmap_event);
- put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
-
- /*
- * doesn't really matter which of the child contexts the
- * events ends up in.
- */
ctx = rcu_dereference(current->perf_event_ctxp);
if (ctx)
perf_event_mmap_ctx(ctx, mmap_event);
+ put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
rcu_read_unlock();
kfree(buf);
@@ -3863,6 +3864,9 @@ static int perf_swevent_match(struct perf_event *event,
struct perf_sample_data *data,
struct pt_regs *regs)
{
+ if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ return 0;
+
if (!perf_swevent_is_counting(event))
return 0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-17 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-17 12:16 [PATCH 0/6] a perf and some sched patches Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:16 ` [PATCH 1/6] sched: Move TASK_STATE_TO_CHAR_STR near the TASK_state bits Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:30 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:16 ` [PATCH 2/6] sched: Add missing state chars to TASK_STATE_TO_CHAR_STR Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:31 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:16 ` [PATCH 3/6] sched: Update task_state_arraypwith new states Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:31 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:16 ` [PATCH 4/6] sched: Assert task state bits at build time Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:31 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:16 ` [PATCH 5/6] sched: Fix broken assertion Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:31 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:16 ` [PATCH 6/6] perf: Dont report side-band events on each cpu for per-task-per-cpu events Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:30 ` tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-12-17 12:23 ` [PATCH 0/6] a perf and some sched patches Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-5d27c23df09b702868d9a3bff86ec6abd22963ac@git.kernel.org \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.