From: tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, peterz@infradead.org,
ananth@in.ibm.com, anton@redhat.com,
masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com, srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, oleg@redhat.com
Subject: [tip:perf/core] uprobes: Kill uprobes_srcu/uprobe_srcu_id
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 09:10:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-778b032d96909690c19d84f8d17c13be65ed6f8e@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120529193008.GG8057@redhat.com>
Commit-ID: 778b032d96909690c19d84f8d17c13be65ed6f8e
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/778b032d96909690c19d84f8d17c13be65ed6f8e
Author: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 29 May 2012 21:30:08 +0200
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 17:22:22 +0200
uprobes: Kill uprobes_srcu/uprobe_srcu_id
Kill the no longer needed uprobes_srcu/uprobe_srcu_id code.
It doesn't really work anyway. synchronize_srcu() can only
synchronize with the code "inside" the
srcu_read_lock/srcu_read_unlock section, while
uprobe_pre_sstep_notifier() does srcu_read_lock() _after_ we
already hit the breakpoint.
I guess this probably works "in practice". synchronize_srcu() is
slow and it implies synchronize_sched(), and the probed task
enters the non- preemptible section at the start of exception
handler. Still this is not right at least in theory, and
task->uprobe_srcu_id blows task_struct.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120529193008.GG8057@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 1 -
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 22 +++-------------------
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 6029d8c..6bd1965 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1569,7 +1569,6 @@ struct task_struct {
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_UPROBES
struct uprobe_task *utask;
- int uprobe_srcu_id;
#endif
};
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 1f02e3b..8c5e043 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -38,7 +38,6 @@
#define UINSNS_PER_PAGE (PAGE_SIZE/UPROBE_XOL_SLOT_BYTES)
#define MAX_UPROBE_XOL_SLOTS UINSNS_PER_PAGE
-static struct srcu_struct uprobes_srcu;
static struct rb_root uprobes_tree = RB_ROOT;
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(uprobes_treelock); /* serialize rbtree access */
@@ -738,20 +737,14 @@ remove_breakpoint(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct mm_struct *mm, loff_t vaddr)
}
/*
- * There could be threads that have hit the breakpoint and are entering the
- * notifier code and trying to acquire the uprobes_treelock. The thread
- * calling delete_uprobe() that is removing the uprobe from the rb_tree can
- * race with these threads and might acquire the uprobes_treelock compared
- * to some of the breakpoint hit threads. In such a case, the breakpoint
- * hit threads will not find the uprobe. The current unregistering thread
- * waits till all other threads have hit a breakpoint, to acquire the
- * uprobes_treelock before the uprobe is removed from the rbtree.
+ * There could be threads that have already hit the breakpoint. They
+ * will recheck the current insn and restart if find_uprobe() fails.
+ * See find_active_uprobe().
*/
static void delete_uprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe)
{
unsigned long flags;
- synchronize_srcu(&uprobes_srcu);
spin_lock_irqsave(&uprobes_treelock, flags);
rb_erase(&uprobe->rb_node, &uprobes_tree);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&uprobes_treelock, flags);
@@ -1388,9 +1381,6 @@ void uprobe_free_utask(struct task_struct *t)
{
struct uprobe_task *utask = t->utask;
- if (t->uprobe_srcu_id != -1)
- srcu_read_unlock_raw(&uprobes_srcu, t->uprobe_srcu_id);
-
if (!utask)
return;
@@ -1408,7 +1398,6 @@ void uprobe_free_utask(struct task_struct *t)
void uprobe_copy_process(struct task_struct *t)
{
t->utask = NULL;
- t->uprobe_srcu_id = -1;
}
/*
@@ -1513,9 +1502,6 @@ static struct uprobe *find_active_uprobe(unsigned long bp_vaddr, int *is_swbp)
} else {
*is_swbp = -EFAULT;
}
-
- srcu_read_unlock_raw(&uprobes_srcu, current->uprobe_srcu_id);
- current->uprobe_srcu_id = -1;
up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
return uprobe;
@@ -1656,7 +1642,6 @@ int uprobe_pre_sstep_notifier(struct pt_regs *regs)
utask->state = UTASK_BP_HIT;
set_thread_flag(TIF_UPROBE);
- current->uprobe_srcu_id = srcu_read_lock_raw(&uprobes_srcu);
return 1;
}
@@ -1691,7 +1676,6 @@ static int __init init_uprobes(void)
mutex_init(&uprobes_mutex[i]);
mutex_init(&uprobes_mmap_mutex[i]);
}
- init_srcu_struct(&uprobes_srcu);
return register_die_notifier(&uprobe_exception_nb);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-06 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-29 19:27 [PATCH 0/7] uprobes: kill uprobes_srcu/uprobe_srcu_id Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-29 19:27 ` [PATCH 1/7] uprobes: optimize is_swbp_at_addr() for current->mm Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-06 15:08 ` [tip:perf/core] uprobes: Optimize is_swbp_at_addr() for current-%3Emm tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-06 16:05 ` [tip:perf/core] uprobes: Optimize is_swbp_at_addr() for current-> mm tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-29 19:27 ` [PATCH 2/7] uprobes: change read_opcode() to use FOLL_FORCE Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-06 15:09 ` [tip:perf/core] uprobes: Change " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-06 16:06 ` tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-29 19:28 ` [PATCH 3/7] uprobes: introduce find_active_uprobe() helper Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-06 15:10 ` [tip:perf/core] uprobes: Introduce " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-06 16:07 ` tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-29 19:29 ` [PATCH 4/7] uprobes: teach find_active_uprobe() to provide the "is_swbp" info Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-06 15:10 ` [tip:perf/core] uprobes: Teach find_active_uprobe() to provide the %22is_swbp%22 info tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-06 16:08 ` [tip:perf/core] uprobes: Teach find_active_uprobe() to provide the "is_swbp" info tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-29 19:29 ` [PATCH 5/7] uprobes: change register_for_each_vma() to take mm->mmap_sem for writing Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-06 15:11 ` [tip:perf/core] uprobes: Change register_for_each_vma() to take mm-%3Emmap_sem " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-06 16:09 ` [tip:perf/core] uprobes: Change register_for_each_vma() to take mm->mmap_sem " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-29 19:29 ` [PATCH 6/7] uprobes: teach handle_swbp() to rely on "is_swbp" rather than uprobes_srcu Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-06 15:12 ` [tip:perf/core] uprobes: Teach handle_swbp() to rely on %22is_swbp%22 " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-06 16:10 ` [tip:perf/core] uprobes: Teach handle_swbp() to rely on "is_swbp" " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-29 19:30 ` [PATCH 7/7] uprobes: kill uprobes_srcu/uprobe_srcu_id Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-29 23:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-30 1:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-06 15:13 ` [tip:perf/core] uprobes: Kill uprobes_srcu/uprobe_srcu_id tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-06 16:10 ` tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-05-31 5:40 ` [PATCH 0/7] uprobes: kill uprobes_srcu/uprobe_srcu_id Srikar Dronamraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-778b032d96909690c19d84f8d17c13be65ed6f8e@git.kernel.org \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.