From: tip-bot for Rik van Riel <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: riel@surriel.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: [tip:x86/mm] smp,cpumask: introduce on_each_cpu_cond_mask
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 07:59:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-7d49b28a80b830c3ca876d33bedc58d62a78e16f@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180926035844.1420-5-riel@surriel.com>
Commit-ID: 7d49b28a80b830c3ca876d33bedc58d62a78e16f
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/7d49b28a80b830c3ca876d33bedc58d62a78e16f
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 23:58:41 -0400
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 16:51:11 +0200
smp,cpumask: introduce on_each_cpu_cond_mask
Introduce a variant of on_each_cpu_cond that iterates only over the
CPUs in a cpumask, in order to avoid making callbacks for every single
CPU in the system when we only need to test a subset.
Cc: npiggin@gmail.com
Cc: mingo@kernel.org
Cc: will.deacon@arm.com
Cc: songliubraving@fb.com
Cc: kernel-team@fb.com
Cc: hpa@zytor.com
Cc: luto@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180926035844.1420-5-riel@surriel.com
---
include/linux/smp.h | 4 ++++
kernel/smp.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
kernel/up.c | 14 +++++++++++---
3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/smp.h b/include/linux/smp.h
index 9fb239e12b82..a56f08ff3097 100644
--- a/include/linux/smp.h
+++ b/include/linux/smp.h
@@ -53,6 +53,10 @@ void on_each_cpu_cond(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
smp_call_func_t func, void *info, bool wait,
gfp_t gfp_flags);
+void on_each_cpu_cond_mask(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
+ smp_call_func_t func, void *info, bool wait,
+ gfp_t gfp_flags, const struct cpumask *mask);
+
int smp_call_function_single_async(int cpu, call_single_data_t *csd);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index a7d4f9f50a49..163c451af42e 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -669,9 +669,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(on_each_cpu_mask);
* You must not call this function with disabled interrupts or
* from a hardware interrupt handler or from a bottom half handler.
*/
-void on_each_cpu_cond(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
+void on_each_cpu_cond_mask(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
smp_call_func_t func, void *info, bool wait,
- gfp_t gfp_flags)
+ gfp_t gfp_flags, const struct cpumask *mask)
{
cpumask_var_t cpus;
int cpu, ret;
@@ -680,7 +680,7 @@ void on_each_cpu_cond(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
if (likely(zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpus, (gfp_flags|__GFP_NOWARN)))) {
preempt_disable();
- for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, mask)
if (cond_func(cpu, info))
__cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpus);
on_each_cpu_mask(cpus, func, info, wait);
@@ -692,7 +692,7 @@ void on_each_cpu_cond(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
* just have to IPI them one by one.
*/
preempt_disable();
- for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, mask)
if (cond_func(cpu, info)) {
ret = smp_call_function_single(cpu, func,
info, wait);
@@ -701,6 +701,15 @@ void on_each_cpu_cond(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
preempt_enable();
}
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(on_each_cpu_cond_mask);
+
+void on_each_cpu_cond(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
+ smp_call_func_t func, void *info, bool wait,
+ gfp_t gfp_flags)
+{
+ on_each_cpu_cond_mask(cond_func, func, info, wait, gfp_flags,
+ cpu_online_mask);
+}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(on_each_cpu_cond);
static void do_nothing(void *unused)
diff --git a/kernel/up.c b/kernel/up.c
index 42c46bf3e0a5..ff536f9cc8a2 100644
--- a/kernel/up.c
+++ b/kernel/up.c
@@ -68,9 +68,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(on_each_cpu_mask);
* Preemption is disabled here to make sure the cond_func is called under the
* same condtions in UP and SMP.
*/
-void on_each_cpu_cond(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
- smp_call_func_t func, void *info, bool wait,
- gfp_t gfp_flags)
+void on_each_cpu_cond_mask(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
+ smp_call_func_t func, void *info, bool wait,
+ gfp_t gfp_flags, const struct cpumask *mask)
{
unsigned long flags;
@@ -82,6 +82,14 @@ void on_each_cpu_cond(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
}
preempt_enable();
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(on_each_cpu_cond_mask);
+
+void on_each_cpu_cond(bool (*cond_func)(int cpu, void *info),
+ smp_call_func_t func, void *info, bool wait,
+ gfp_t gfp_flags)
+{
+ on_each_cpu_cond_mask(cond_func, func, info, wait, gfp_flags, NULL);
+}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(on_each_cpu_cond);
int smp_call_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, int (*func)(void *), void *par, bool phys)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-09 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-26 3:58 [PATCH v2 0/7] x86/mm/tlb: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel
2018-09-26 3:58 ` [PATCH 1/7] x86/mm/tlb: Always use lazy TLB mode Rik van Riel
2018-10-01 15:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-01 16:07 ` Rik van Riel
2018-09-26 3:58 ` [PATCH 2/7] x86/mm/tlb: Restructure switch_mm_irqs_off() Rik van Riel
2018-10-02 7:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-26 3:58 ` [PATCH 3/7] smp: use __cpumask_set_cpu in on_each_cpu_cond Rik van Riel
2018-10-09 14:59 ` [tip:x86/mm] " tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2018-09-26 3:58 ` [PATCH 4/7] smp,cpumask: introduce on_each_cpu_cond_mask Rik van Riel
2018-10-09 14:59 ` tip-bot for Rik van Riel [this message]
2018-09-26 3:58 ` [PATCH 5/7] Add freed_tables argument to flush_tlb_mm_range Rik van Riel
2018-10-09 15:00 ` [tip:x86/mm] x86/mm/tlb: " tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2018-09-26 3:58 ` [PATCH 6/7] Add freed_tables element to flush_tlb_info Rik van Riel
2018-10-09 15:00 ` [tip:x86/mm] x86/mm/tlb: " tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2018-09-26 3:58 ` [PATCH 7/7] x86/mm/tlb: Make lazy TLB mode lazier Rik van Riel
2018-10-01 16:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-09 15:01 ` [tip:x86/mm] " tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2018-10-01 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] x86/mm/tlb: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-02 7:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-02 13:41 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-7d49b28a80b830c3ca876d33bedc58d62a78e16f@git.kernel.org \
--to=tipbot@zytor.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.