From: tip-bot for Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, dvhart@linux.intel.com,
richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@elte.hu
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched: Allow users with sufficient RLIMIT_NICE to change from SCHED_IDLE policy
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:49:46 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-c02aa73b1d18e43cfd79c2f193b225e84ca497c8@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D657BEE.4040608@linux.intel.com>
Commit-ID: c02aa73b1d18e43cfd79c2f193b225e84ca497c8
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/c02aa73b1d18e43cfd79c2f193b225e84ca497c8
Author: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:37:07 -0800
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:14:30 +0100
sched: Allow users with sufficient RLIMIT_NICE to change from SCHED_IDLE policy
The current scheduler implementation returns -EPERM when trying to
change from SCHED_IDLE to SCHED_OTHER or SCHED_BATCH. Since SCHED_IDLE
is considered to be a nice 20 on steroids, changing to another policy
should be allowed provided the RLIMIT_NICE is accounted for.
This patch allows the following test-case to pass with RLIMIT_NICE=40,
but still fail with RLIMIT_NICE=10 when the calling process is run
from a typical shell (nice 0, or 20 in rlimit terms).
int main()
{
int ret;
struct sched_param sp;
sp.sched_priority = 0;
/* switch to SCHED_IDLE */
ret = sched_setscheduler(0, SCHED_IDLE, &sp);
printf("setscheduler IDLE: %d\n", ret);
if (ret) return ret;
/* switch back to SCHED_OTHER */
ret = sched_setscheduler(0, SCHED_OTHER, &sp);
printf("setscheduler OTHER: %d\n", ret);
return ret;
}
$ ulimit -e
40
$ ./test
setscheduler IDLE: 0
setscheduler OTHER: 0
$ ulimit -e 10
$ ulimit -e
10
$ ./test
setscheduler IDLE: 0
setscheduler OTHER: -1
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
LKML-Reference: <4D657BEE.4040608@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
kernel/sched.c | 11 +++++++----
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 0c87126..f303070 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -4981,12 +4981,15 @@ recheck:
param->sched_priority > rlim_rtprio)
return -EPERM;
}
+
/*
- * Like positive nice levels, dont allow tasks to
- * move out of SCHED_IDLE either:
+ * Treat SCHED_IDLE as nice 20. Only allow a switch to
+ * SCHED_NORMAL if the RLIMIT_NICE would normally permit it.
*/
- if (p->policy == SCHED_IDLE && policy != SCHED_IDLE)
- return -EPERM;
+ if (p->policy == SCHED_IDLE && policy != SCHED_IDLE) {
+ if (!can_nice(p, TASK_NICE(p)))
+ return -EPERM;
+ }
/* can't change other user's priorities */
if (!check_same_owner(p))
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-04 11:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-22 21:04 [PATCH 0/2] sched: SCHED_BATCH fixes Darren Hart
2011-02-22 21:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched: allow SCHED_BATCH to preempt SCHED_IDLE tasks Darren Hart
2011-02-23 4:20 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-23 5:31 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-02-23 5:33 ` Darren Hart
2011-03-04 11:49 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Allow " tip-bot for Darren Hart
2011-02-22 21:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched: allow users with rtprio rlimit to change from SCHED_IDLE policy Darren Hart
2011-02-23 11:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-23 11:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-23 11:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-23 11:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-23 15:52 ` Darren Hart
2011-02-23 16:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-23 16:07 ` Darren Hart
2011-02-23 21:28 ` Darren Hart
2011-02-24 11:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-04 11:49 ` tip-bot for Darren Hart [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-c02aa73b1d18e43cfd79c2f193b225e84ca497c8@git.kernel.org \
--to=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.