From: "tip-bot for Bu, Yitian" <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@kernel.org,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, ybu@qti.qualcomm.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: [tip:core/printk] printk: Fix rq-> lock vs logbuf_lock unlock lock inversion
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 06:17:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-dbda92d16f8655044e082930e4e9d244b87fde77@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E807E903FE6CBE4D95E420FBFCC273B827413C@nasanexd01h.na.qualcomm.com>
Commit-ID: dbda92d16f8655044e082930e4e9d244b87fde77
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/dbda92d16f8655044e082930e4e9d244b87fde77
Author: Bu, Yitian <ybu@qti.qualcomm.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:53:37 +0000
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitDate: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:05:57 +0100
printk: Fix rq->lock vs logbuf_lock unlock lock inversion
commit 07354eb1a74d1 ("locking printk: Annotate logbuf_lock as raw")
reintroduced a lock inversion problem which was fixed in commit
0b5e1c5255 ("printk: Release console_sem after logbuf_lock"). This
happened probably when fixing up patch rejects.
Restore the ordering and unlock logbuf_lock before releasing
console_sem.
Signed-off-by: ybu <ybu@qti.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/E807E903FE6CBE4D95E420FBFCC273B827413C@nasanexd01h.na.qualcomm.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/printk.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/printk.c b/kernel/printk.c
index 267ce78..e698e80 100644
--- a/kernel/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk.c
@@ -1358,9 +1358,9 @@ static int console_trylock_for_printk(unsigned int cpu)
}
}
logbuf_cpu = UINT_MAX;
+ raw_spin_unlock(&logbuf_lock);
if (wake)
up(&console_sem);
- raw_spin_unlock(&logbuf_lock);
return retval;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-18 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-18 12:53 [PATCH] Fix rq->lock vs logbuf_lock unlock race Bu, Yitian
2013-02-18 14:17 ` tip-bot for Bu, Yitian [this message]
2013-02-20 8:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-20 9:38 ` Bu, Yitian
2013-02-20 10:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-20 11:24 ` Bu, Yitian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-dbda92d16f8655044e082930e4e9d244b87fde77@git.kernel.org \
--to=tipbot@zytor.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=ybu@qti.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.