From: "tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Move rcu_barrier() to rcutree, make lightweight rcu_barrier() for rcutiny
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 19:10:56 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-eddd96296949009aa10a6f41ebf01d14420f6dec@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12541998233817-git-send-email->
Commit-ID: eddd96296949009aa10a6f41ebf01d14420f6dec
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/eddd96296949009aa10a6f41ebf01d14420f6dec
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:50:22 -0700
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 21:05:39 +0200
rcu: Move rcu_barrier() to rcutree, make lightweight rcu_barrier() for rcutiny
Move the existing rcu_barrier() implementation to rcutree.c,
permitting creation of a smaller and lighter-weight implementation
for rcutiny.c (which is equivalent to rcutree.c's synchronize_rcu()
because rcutiny.c supports but one CPU).
This opens the way to simplify and fix rcutree.c's rcu_barrier()
implementation in a later patch.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: dipankar@in.ibm.com
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org
Cc: dvhltc@us.ibm.com
Cc: niv@us.ibm.com
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com
LKML-Reference: <12541998233817-git-send-email->
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
kernel/rcupdate.c | 120 +----------------------------------------------------
kernel/rcutiny.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++
kernel/rcutree.c | 119 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 119 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcupdate.c b/kernel/rcupdate.c
index fd3ec49..7625f20 100644
--- a/kernel/rcupdate.c
+++ b/kernel/rcupdate.c
@@ -53,16 +53,8 @@ struct lockdep_map rcu_lock_map =
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_lock_map);
#endif
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_head, rcu_barrier_head) = {NULL};
-static atomic_t rcu_barrier_cpu_count;
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(rcu_barrier_mutex);
-static struct completion rcu_barrier_completion;
int rcu_scheduler_active __read_mostly;
-static atomic_t rcu_migrate_type_count = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
-static struct rcu_head rcu_migrate_head[3];
-static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(rcu_migrate_wq);
-
/*
* Awaken the corresponding synchronize_rcu() instance now that a
* grace period has elapsed.
@@ -169,120 +161,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu_bh);
#endif /* #ifndef CONFIG_TINY_RCU */
-static void rcu_barrier_callback(struct rcu_head *notused)
-{
- if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count))
- complete(&rcu_barrier_completion);
-}
-
-/*
- * Called with preemption disabled, and from cross-cpu IRQ context.
- */
-static void rcu_barrier_func(void *type)
-{
- int cpu = smp_processor_id();
- struct rcu_head *head = &per_cpu(rcu_barrier_head, cpu);
- void (*call_rcu_func)(struct rcu_head *head,
- void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head));
-
- atomic_inc(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count);
- call_rcu_func = type;
- call_rcu_func(head, rcu_barrier_callback);
-}
-
-static inline void wait_migrated_callbacks(void)
-{
- wait_event(rcu_migrate_wq, !atomic_read(&rcu_migrate_type_count));
- smp_mb(); /* In case we didn't sleep. */
-}
-
-/*
- * Orchestrate the specified type of RCU barrier, waiting for all
- * RCU callbacks of the specified type to complete.
- */
-static void _rcu_barrier(void (*call_rcu_func)(struct rcu_head *head,
- void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head)))
-{
- BUG_ON(in_interrupt());
- /* Take cpucontrol mutex to protect against CPU hotplug */
- mutex_lock(&rcu_barrier_mutex);
- init_completion(&rcu_barrier_completion);
- /*
- * Initialize rcu_barrier_cpu_count to 1, then invoke
- * rcu_barrier_func() on each CPU, so that each CPU also has
- * incremented rcu_barrier_cpu_count. Only then is it safe to
- * decrement rcu_barrier_cpu_count -- otherwise the first CPU
- * might complete its grace period before all of the other CPUs
- * did their increment, causing this function to return too
- * early.
- */
- atomic_set(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count, 1);
- on_each_cpu(rcu_barrier_func, (void *)call_rcu_func, 1);
- if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count))
- complete(&rcu_barrier_completion);
- wait_for_completion(&rcu_barrier_completion);
- mutex_unlock(&rcu_barrier_mutex);
- wait_migrated_callbacks();
-}
-
-/**
- * rcu_barrier - Wait until all in-flight call_rcu() callbacks complete.
- */
-void rcu_barrier(void)
-{
- _rcu_barrier(call_rcu);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier);
-
-/**
- * rcu_barrier_bh - Wait until all in-flight call_rcu_bh() callbacks complete.
- */
-void rcu_barrier_bh(void)
-{
- _rcu_barrier(call_rcu_bh);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier_bh);
-
-/**
- * rcu_barrier_sched - Wait for in-flight call_rcu_sched() callbacks.
- */
-void rcu_barrier_sched(void)
-{
- _rcu_barrier(call_rcu_sched);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier_sched);
-
-static void rcu_migrate_callback(struct rcu_head *notused)
-{
- if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rcu_migrate_type_count))
- wake_up(&rcu_migrate_wq);
-}
-
static int __cpuinit rcu_barrier_cpu_hotplug(struct notifier_block *self,
unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
{
- rcu_cpu_notify(self, action, hcpu);
- if (action == CPU_DYING) {
- /*
- * preempt_disable() in on_each_cpu() prevents stop_machine(),
- * so when "on_each_cpu(rcu_barrier_func, (void *)type, 1);"
- * returns, all online cpus have queued rcu_barrier_func(),
- * and the dead cpu(if it exist) queues rcu_migrate_callback()s.
- *
- * These callbacks ensure _rcu_barrier() waits for all
- * RCU callbacks of the specified type to complete.
- */
- atomic_set(&rcu_migrate_type_count, 3);
- call_rcu_bh(rcu_migrate_head, rcu_migrate_callback);
- call_rcu_sched(rcu_migrate_head + 1, rcu_migrate_callback);
- call_rcu(rcu_migrate_head + 2, rcu_migrate_callback);
- } else if (action == CPU_DOWN_PREPARE) {
- /* Don't need to wait until next removal operation. */
- /* rcu_migrate_head is protected by cpu_add_remove_lock */
- wait_migrated_callbacks();
- }
-
- return NOTIFY_OK;
+ return rcu_cpu_notify(self, action, hcpu);
}
void __init rcu_init(void)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutiny.c b/kernel/rcutiny.c
index 070c65f..89124b0 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutiny.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutiny.c
@@ -239,6 +239,42 @@ void call_rcu_bh(struct rcu_head *head,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_rcu_bh);
+void rcu_barrier(void)
+{
+ struct rcu_synchronize rcu;
+
+ init_completion(&rcu.completion);
+ /* Will wake me after RCU finished. */
+ call_rcu(&rcu.head, wakeme_after_rcu);
+ /* Wait for it. */
+ wait_for_completion(&rcu.completion);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier);
+
+void rcu_barrier_bh(void)
+{
+ struct rcu_synchronize rcu;
+
+ init_completion(&rcu.completion);
+ /* Will wake me after RCU finished. */
+ call_rcu_bh(&rcu.head, wakeme_after_rcu);
+ /* Wait for it. */
+ wait_for_completion(&rcu.completion);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier_bh);
+
+void rcu_barrier_sched(void)
+{
+ struct rcu_synchronize rcu;
+
+ init_completion(&rcu.completion);
+ /* Will wake me after RCU finished. */
+ call_rcu_sched(&rcu.head, wakeme_after_rcu);
+ /* Wait for it. */
+ wait_for_completion(&rcu.completion);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier_sched);
+
void __rcu_init(void)
{
open_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ, rcu_process_callbacks);
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index e2e272b..0108570 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -1363,6 +1363,103 @@ int rcu_needs_cpu(int cpu)
rcu_preempt_needs_cpu(cpu);
}
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_head, rcu_barrier_head) = {NULL};
+static atomic_t rcu_barrier_cpu_count;
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(rcu_barrier_mutex);
+static struct completion rcu_barrier_completion;
+static atomic_t rcu_migrate_type_count = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
+static struct rcu_head rcu_migrate_head[3];
+static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(rcu_migrate_wq);
+
+static void rcu_barrier_callback(struct rcu_head *notused)
+{
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count))
+ complete(&rcu_barrier_completion);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Called with preemption disabled, and from cross-cpu IRQ context.
+ */
+static void rcu_barrier_func(void *type)
+{
+ int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ struct rcu_head *head = &per_cpu(rcu_barrier_head, cpu);
+ void (*call_rcu_func)(struct rcu_head *head,
+ void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head));
+
+ atomic_inc(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count);
+ call_rcu_func = type;
+ call_rcu_func(head, rcu_barrier_callback);
+}
+
+static inline void wait_migrated_callbacks(void)
+{
+ wait_event(rcu_migrate_wq, !atomic_read(&rcu_migrate_type_count));
+ smp_mb(); /* In case we didn't sleep. */
+}
+
+/*
+ * Orchestrate the specified type of RCU barrier, waiting for all
+ * RCU callbacks of the specified type to complete.
+ */
+static void _rcu_barrier(void (*call_rcu_func)(struct rcu_head *head,
+ void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head)))
+{
+ BUG_ON(in_interrupt());
+ /* Take cpucontrol mutex to protect against CPU hotplug */
+ mutex_lock(&rcu_barrier_mutex);
+ init_completion(&rcu_barrier_completion);
+ /*
+ * Initialize rcu_barrier_cpu_count to 1, then invoke
+ * rcu_barrier_func() on each CPU, so that each CPU also has
+ * incremented rcu_barrier_cpu_count. Only then is it safe to
+ * decrement rcu_barrier_cpu_count -- otherwise the first CPU
+ * might complete its grace period before all of the other CPUs
+ * did their increment, causing this function to return too
+ * early.
+ */
+ atomic_set(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count, 1);
+ on_each_cpu(rcu_barrier_func, (void *)call_rcu_func, 1);
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count))
+ complete(&rcu_barrier_completion);
+ wait_for_completion(&rcu_barrier_completion);
+ mutex_unlock(&rcu_barrier_mutex);
+ wait_migrated_callbacks();
+}
+
+/**
+ * rcu_barrier - Wait until all in-flight call_rcu() callbacks complete.
+ */
+void rcu_barrier(void)
+{
+ _rcu_barrier(call_rcu);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier);
+
+/**
+ * rcu_barrier_bh - Wait until all in-flight call_rcu_bh() callbacks complete.
+ */
+void rcu_barrier_bh(void)
+{
+ _rcu_barrier(call_rcu_bh);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier_bh);
+
+/**
+ * rcu_barrier_sched - Wait for in-flight call_rcu_sched() callbacks.
+ */
+void rcu_barrier_sched(void)
+{
+ _rcu_barrier(call_rcu_sched);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier_sched);
+
+static void rcu_migrate_callback(struct rcu_head *notused)
+{
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rcu_migrate_type_count))
+ wake_up(&rcu_migrate_wq);
+}
+
/*
* Do boot-time initialization of a CPU's per-CPU RCU data.
*/
@@ -1459,6 +1556,28 @@ int __cpuinit rcu_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
case CPU_UP_PREPARE_FROZEN:
rcu_online_cpu(cpu);
break;
+ case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
+ case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE_FROZEN:
+ /* Don't need to wait until next removal operation. */
+ /* rcu_migrate_head is protected by cpu_add_remove_lock */
+ wait_migrated_callbacks();
+ break;
+ case CPU_DYING:
+ case CPU_DYING_FROZEN:
+ /*
+ * preempt_disable() in on_each_cpu() prevents stop_machine(),
+ * so when "on_each_cpu(rcu_barrier_func, (void *)type, 1);"
+ * returns, all online cpus have queued rcu_barrier_func(),
+ * and the dead cpu(if it exist) queues rcu_migrate_callback()s.
+ *
+ * These callbacks ensure _rcu_barrier() waits for all
+ * RCU callbacks of the specified type to complete.
+ */
+ atomic_set(&rcu_migrate_type_count, 3);
+ call_rcu_bh(rcu_migrate_head, rcu_migrate_callback);
+ call_rcu_sched(rcu_migrate_head + 1, rcu_migrate_callback);
+ call_rcu(rcu_migrate_head + 2, rcu_migrate_callback);
+ break;
case CPU_DEAD:
case CPU_DEAD_FROZEN:
case CPU_UP_CANCELED:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-05 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-29 4:49 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/3] rcu: simplify rcu_barrier() interaction with CPU hotplug Paul E. McKenney
2009-09-29 4:50 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] rcu: replace the rcu_barrier enum with pointer to call_rcu*() function Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-01 7:46 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Replace " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-05 19:10 ` tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2009-09-29 4:50 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/3] rcu: move rcu_barrier() to rcutree, make lightweight rcu_barrier() for rcutiny Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-01 7:46 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Move " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-05 19:10 ` tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2009-09-29 4:50 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/3] rcu: make hot-unplugged CPU relinquish its own RCU callbacks Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-01 7:46 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Make " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-05 19:11 ` tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-eddd96296949009aa10a6f41ebf01d14420f6dec@git.kernel.org \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.