From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
yinghai@kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, ebiederm@xmission.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: [tip:x86/apic] x86: fix set_extra_move_desc calling
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:15:31 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-fa74c9073370e57fa28e02aff13f4d7b1806505c@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49C94134.4000408@kernel.org>
Commit-ID: fa74c9073370e57fa28e02aff13f4d7b1806505c
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/fa74c9073370e57fa28e02aff13f4d7b1806505c
Author: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
AuthorDate: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:23:16 -0700
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:12:10 +0100
x86: fix set_extra_move_desc calling
Impact: fix bug with irq-descriptor moving when logical flat
Rusty observed:
> The effect of setting desc->affinity (ie. from userspace via sysfs) has varied
> over time. In 2.6.27, the 32-bit code anded the value with cpu_online_map,
> and both 32 and 64-bit did that anding whenever a cpu was unplugged.
>
> 2.6.29 consolidated this into one routine (and fixed hotplug) but introduced
> another variation: anding the affinity with cfg->domain. Is this right, or
> should we just set it to what the user said? Or as now, indicate that we're
> restricting it.
Eric pointed out that desc->affinity should be what the user requested,
if it is at all possible to honor the user space request.
This bug got introduced by commit 22f65d31b "x86: Update io_apic.c to use
new cpumask API".
Fix it by moving the masking to before the descriptor moving ...
Reported-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Reported-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
LKML-Reference: <49C94134.4000408@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
index 86827d8..1ed6c06 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
@@ -592,8 +592,9 @@ set_desc_affinity(struct irq_desc *desc, const struct cpumask *mask)
if (assign_irq_vector(irq, cfg, mask))
return BAD_APICID;
- cpumask_and(desc->affinity, cfg->domain, mask);
+ /* check that before desc->addinity get updated */
set_extra_move_desc(desc, mask);
+ cpumask_and(desc->affinity, cfg->domain, mask);
return apic->cpu_mask_to_apicid_and(desc->affinity, cpu_online_mask);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-24 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-24 5:49 [RFC] Correct behaviour of irq affinity? Rusty Russell
2009-03-24 7:21 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-24 12:52 ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-24 20:36 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-24 12:39 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-03-24 19:49 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-24 20:23 ` [PATCH] x86: fix set_extra_move_desc calling Yinghai Lu
2009-03-24 21:15 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2009-03-24 21:15 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Yinghai Lu
2009-03-24 21:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86: use default_cpu_mask_to_apicid for 64bit Yinghai Lu
2009-03-24 21:30 ` [tip:x86/apic] " Yinghai Lu
2009-03-24 21:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-24 21:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86: Correct behaviour of irq affinity -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-03-24 21:17 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86: Correct behaviour of irq affinity Yinghai Lu
2009-03-24 21:30 ` [tip:x86/apic] " Rusty Russell
2009-03-25 17:51 ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-25 0:33 ` [RFC] Correct behaviour of irq affinity? Rusty Russell
2009-03-25 0:59 ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-25 1:03 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-fa74c9073370e57fa28e02aff13f4d7b1806505c@git.kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.