From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jari Aalto Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change options to alphabetical order Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:29:11 +0300 Organization: Private Message-ID: References: <6431frn5.fsf@cante.net> <7vps19l7dl.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Aug 27 15:25:33 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IPeaw-000252-0v for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:25:30 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752026AbXH0NZ1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:25:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751066AbXH0NZ1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:25:27 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:50734 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750752AbXH0NZ0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:25:26 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IPeaf-0006xB-WB for git@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:25:14 +0200 Received: from a81-197-175-198.elisa-laajakaista.fi ([81.197.175.198]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:25:13 +0200 Received: from jari.aalto by a81-197-175-198.elisa-laajakaista.fi with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:25:13 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: a81-197-175-198.elisa-laajakaista.fi User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.3 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:pkXgUKoZ8XHG4frpbkZg9nBhErg= Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano writes: > This might make sense but I do not want a patch only to git-tag > and I certainly do not want it right now. You could apply this, we must start somewhere. > If it makes sense to reorder in alphabetical order, we would > want to do so for everybody at once. No problem, I'll look into it and provide more patches. Jari