From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Boutcher Subject: new scsi driver etiquette Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 11:44:44 -0600 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.102]:5838 "EHLO e2.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263221AbUAIRqm (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:46:42 -0500 Received: from northrelay04.pok.ibm.com (northrelay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.206]) by e2.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i09Hkgd6436666 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:46:42 -0500 List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org After the recent discussions on people bypassing the linux-scsi list with their scsi code, I would not dream of such a faux pas. I'm about to submit a bunch of code for your collective review. If I have a couple of big new driver files (e.g. 3500+ lines), what is the most appropriate format for review? Just include them inline in a mailing to the list? I'm not quite ready to send them as a formal patch. Thanks, Dave B