All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcus Sundberg <marcus@cendio.se>
To: Dan Malek <dan@netx4.com>
Cc: Seungdong Lee <sdlee@da-san.com>, linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: 8240 BogoMIPS
Date: 20 May 2000 22:14:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <vehfbtasi8.fsf@lipta.cendio.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Dan Malek's message of "Sat, 20 May 2000 13:36:21 -0400"


Dan Malek <dan@netx4.com> writes:

> Seungdong Lee wrote:
> > BogoMIPS value of my board is currently 131.89.
> > My board is configured to run in 200MHz system clock.
>
> I have not booted my 8240 for a while, and I don't remember the number.
> I have another 8240 showing up soon, so I will be back on that before
> long and will pay attention to this.  For some reason, I do remember that
> with caches disabled this number is _really_ small, like 13 or 18 or
> something.

I'm not very familiar with 82x0 processors, but doesn't 8240 use a
603-core? When I worked with a 603ev running at 200 MHz I got
something like 133 BogoMIPS, so then the above value would be correct.

> I wouldn't use BogoMIPS for any kind of benchmark.  There have been
> plenty of discussions on mailing lists (including linuxppc lists) to
> indicate this abosolute number doesn't mean much.  I have many PowerPC
> systems running Linux, from 8xx embedded though 7400/G4 systems.  I
> certainly can't predict what this number "should" be.

The BogoMIPS can be used for rough sanity-checks when comparing
processors with identical cores and different clocks. For anything
else it's completely useless. And excelent example is that a
Pentium CPU gives a BogoMIPS value of about 1xclock, while a Pentium
MMX CPU gives about 2xclock, even though their real-life performance
is practicly the same.

//Marcus
--
-------------------------------+-----------------------------------
        Marcus Sundberg        |       Phone: +46 707 452062
  Embedded Systems Consultant  |      Email: marcus@cendio.se
       Cendio Systems AB       |       http://www.cendio.com

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2000-05-20 20:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-05-20  7:28 8240 BogoMIPS Seungdong Lee
2000-05-20 17:36 ` Dan Malek
2000-05-20 20:14   ` Marcus Sundberg [this message]
2000-05-22  2:38     ` Seungdong Lee
2000-05-22  9:34       ` Marcus Sundberg
2000-05-22  9:54         ` Seungdong Lee
2000-05-22 10:50           ` Geir Frode Raanes
2000-05-22 11:19             ` Seungdong Lee
2000-05-26  7:45         ` Seungdong Lee
2000-05-22  2:29   ` Seungdong Lee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=vehfbtasi8.fsf@lipta.cendio.se \
    --to=marcus@cendio.se \
    --cc=dan@netx4.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=sdlee@da-san.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.